Souths Penalty Try

Frank said:
The old saying "a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush" comes to mind.

you reminded me of one of my favourite pieces of graffiti;

"an orgasm in the bush is worth................"


oh, and by the way, I think it was a generous decision but agree with the logic from ads above re changing the slant of the wording and justifying it by the fact that illegal play removes your rights to a fair trial - or something!
 
I agree with chip & chase 100%.

A try was likely, but not certain. In my opinion the sin bin would have been a better option here.

A penalty try was far too generous in this case.
 
Yep, as above posters. Don't forget Dugan would've got a reasonable shot on him just as he would've got the ball, so no cert to score - 70/30 to score in my book.
Sin Bin & penalty would be my verdict - yes even if it was Snake that got tackled.
 
I agree that a penalty and 10 in the bin would have been sufficient.
There was still 20% uncertainty that he might not have scored.
On that basis, I don't think it should have been a penalty try.
 
Because GI plays for Souths and used to play for Melbourne, I think he should have received 10 in the bin and a penalty to Canberra.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 16 13 0 3 104 28
2 Bulldogs 14 11 0 3 96 28
3 Storm 14 10 0 4 196 26
4 Warriors 15 10 0 5 11 24
5 Broncos 15 8 0 7 64 20
6 Roosters 14 7 0 7 16 20
7 Panthers 15 7 1 7 3 19
8 Dolphins 16 8 0 8 162 18
9 Sea Eagles 15 7 0 8 40 18
10 Sharks 16 8 0 8 -4 18
11 Dragons 14 6 0 8 -45 18
12 Cowboys 15 6 1 8 -134 17
13 Knights 16 6 0 10 -67 14
14 Tigers 15 5 0 10 -84 14
15 Eels 15 5 0 10 -103 14
16 Rabbitohs 16 6 0 10 -111 14
17 Titans 15 4 0 11 -144 12
Back
Top Bottom