Croker should never ever see first grade again. Period.If Croker gets picked again as starting 9 over Simpkins then any doubts about Siebold being a fool will be gone.
And he is worse as a 14 as offers zero in terms of impact.
Don’t think Simpkins is the absolute answer either but at least he is a hooker and he shows improvement.
Tuesday will tell us a lot about the coach ( if Croker is fit )
just saw it reported on one eye eel it's 685 a season so I reckon he can afford pretty much anywhere, and if true that's massive overs.
Fan forums are always accurate with their information 😁just saw it reported on one eye eel it's 685 a season so I reckon he can afford pretty much anywhere, and if true that's massive overs.
haha that's why I said "if true"Fan forums are always accurate with their information 😁
Anybody know how much he's getting ?Agree that we are probably not an attractive option for young talent at the moment, but in fairness, neither are the Eels. Really, 9.75 times out of 10, it all comes down to money. If we'd offered more money than the Eels offered, he would have come here.
For argument sake,whether you believe the figure to be true,$685K could be a bargain in yr 2-3 of his 4.5 yr contract.Eels would back themselves to get him up to that levelIf that's accurate, I'm glad we didn't get successful in a bidding war.
Agreed!If that's accurate, I'm glad we didn't get successful in a bidding war.
For argument sake,whether you believe the figure to be true,$685K could be a bargain in yr 2-3 of his 4.5 yr contract.Eels would back themselves to get him up to that level
What does that mean?
Than settle in for a period of never signing any player we and other clubs want. We are in a position like tigers,eels,dragons and others who have to over pay.If that's accurate, I'm glad we didn't get successful in a bidding war.
Yeah, the beachy lifestyle gets em in.Yep, confirmed.
Apparently he wanted to a coach that could improve his game. That ruled out Seibold.
We are the new Gold Coast - a place for old washed up players to retire.
I'd argue Simpkins on less over the same time frame would give us similar overall value....whilst also givingus ability to further strengthen other areas.
Than settle in for a period of never signing any player we and other clubs want. We are in a position like tigers,eels,dragons and others who have to over pay.
The only way to rectify that is sign a coach who can attract talent but we shouldn't kid ourselves if we want a player we are paying overs or we are not getting them.
Didn't we just pick up a young prop from the Knights who seemingly wanted to test himself on the open market?
We did ,but he will be testing himself in the rehab ward as he is injuredDidn't we just pick up a young prop from the Knights who seemingly wanted to test himself on the open market?
Than settle in for a period of never signing any player we and other clubs want.
Really? you comparing a guy that most have never heard of with a player that 4 or 5 clubs wanted.
For argument sake,whether you believe the figure to be true,$685K could be a bargain in yr 2-3 of his 4.5 yr contract.Eels would back themselves to get him up to that level
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 16 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 104 | 28 |
2 | Bulldogs | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 28 |
3 | Storm | 13 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 172 | 24 |
4 | Warriors | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 |
5 | Broncos | 15 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 64 | 20 |
6 | Roosters | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 20 |
7 | Panthers | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 19 |
8 | Dolphins | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 162 | 18 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 15 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 18 |
10 | Sharks | 15 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 20 | 18 |
11 | Dragons | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -45 | 18 |
12 | Cowboys | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | -140 | 15 |
13 | Knights | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -67 | 14 |
14 | Tigers | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -84 | 14 |
15 | Eels | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -103 | 14 |
16 | Rabbitohs | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -111 | 14 |
17 | Titans | 14 | 4 | 0 | 10 | -138 | 12 |