I gave you my opinion . Read the last post and you have your answerI know the answer from the CEO = Fogarty. I am interested in your opinion.
Your last sentence nails it.Maybe, maybe, maybe ..... who the fxck knows why he signed with the Eels? I would guess it is just simply more $$$$. We / you know nothing about the negotiations with this kid. You're just using this to promote your anti Seibold / Mestrov position. I don't know if they fxcked it up but maybe our management was thinking about our cap and needs money for other signings? The only certainty here is that we're all sausage roll eating numpties and apart from probably one person on here (I acknowledge @AndWeDon'tCare ) none of us have a clue and will never know what actually transpired.
When I read the post it was Manly but apparently he's gone with the Bulldogs.Manly or bulldogs ???
Personally, I would have liked Da Silva to sign at Manly because I think he is going to be better than Simpkin and obviously Croker, but…I reckon 4 years at 650K is pretty mental. That’s a lot of coin for potential.
Big money and long contract for potential.Personally, I would have liked Da Silva to sign at Manly because I think he is going to be better than Simpkin and obviously Croker, but…I reckon 4 years at 650K is pretty mental. That’s a lot of coin for potential.
Recently, they have been losing them hand over fist for the last decadeThat is only 100k per year less than Galvin.
How many players has Tigers lost recently? Including all the schiit ones we bought 😄
Would not be surprised in the slightest if you pick up Reed Mahoney, I rate him a quality hookerTime will tell
What we know 100% is
There is a shortage of Quality halves and hookers
and the shortage is going to shorten with 2 new team coming into the comp soon
I hate the bloke, so I'd much prefer he stuck with your lot.🙂 But I also heard the Cowboys (who will need a hooker next year) are another potential destination.Would not be surprised in the slightest if you pick up Reed Mahoney, I rate him a quality hooker
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 16 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 104 | 28 |
2 | Bulldogs | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 28 |
3 | Storm | 14 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 196 | 26 |
4 | Warriors | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 24 |
5 | Broncos | 15 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 64 | 20 |
6 | Roosters | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 20 |
7 | Panthers | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 19 |
8 | Dolphins | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 162 | 18 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 15 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 40 | 18 |
10 | Sharks | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | -4 | 18 |
11 | Dragons | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -45 | 18 |
12 | Cowboys | 15 | 6 | 1 | 8 | -134 | 17 |
13 | Knights | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -67 | 14 |
14 | Tigers | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -84 | 14 |
15 | Eels | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -103 | 14 |
16 | Rabbitohs | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -111 | 14 |
17 | Titans | 15 | 4 | 0 | 11 | -144 | 12 |