So the proposition is:
1. Kids get hooked on a drug cycle & it spirals out of control as they graduate to the top level. This is no different to "20 years ago".
2. A current star has gone into drug rehab, evidenced because he had a tattoo. Drug testing didn't pick anything up, and there is nothing provable.
3. The ACC are wrong to say that there is a problem unless they first prove it through drug testing and the courts.
4. The gov't somehow forced the ACC to say this, for political gain, even though the ACC will very soon have a new gov't.
5. The ACC should have only focused on identifying a junior problem, though you think the problem spirals out of control as the kids go to the top level.
Is that the key points?