Why would I care? However I do care when you say I “make up untrue claims about other posters” and am "willing to lie”. Which goes back to this exchange:
Yet despite pointing you to the evidence you wanted, you have continued to allege that I lied about this.
So today I posted the screenshot. It speaks for itself. Exhibit 1, see post # 229 above
I must say I know very little about Jordan Petersen but I’d be surprised if he wasn’t disappointed in your approach to all this. Bluster? An attempt to blow smoke by talking of “fantasy” … “nut job” … “dogmatic priest” etc) in a futile attempt to distract attention from what is now an overwhelming blatantly obvious open-and-shut case.
Don’t you’d think Jordan would prefer you to stand up straight like a man? Own it. Stick to your guns.
He might suggest you reply more like this:
“Yes I now see that one claim was found false. And I did post it, and it was a claim anti-vaxxers were making, so I was hasty in accusing you of lying about this.
"Nevertheless, while I am definitely no anti-vaxxer myself, I did and absolutely do support their right to make decisions about their bodies, for example. This is consistent with my strong belief in freedom of choice. And the right to free speech”
Don’t you agree, something like that could have at least given us a platform to continue a discussion?