trial vs Chooks

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
Garrick i didn't see him
Elliot seems to be ok safe under the high ball moves well he will be a good back up
Waddell has been pretty good.
The bald guy is a weapon as is gojetski
The Lebanese international abbas is a good winger lol
Bald guy is saunders. I like him. Big motor and hits hard. Elgey went well first half, Winterstein has been good second half, as has cade cust and the Lebanon winger and anderson look good prospects.

Saunders mom for me
 
What's with all the emphasis on the under strength Chooks when we are fielding a reserve grade team?
I agree we were understrength to
If it was full strength squads it would of been a close match
That commentatory has no future calling nrl so hopeless
Get beaver in next year.
Good to have the win
 

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
8 7 1 56 16
7 6 1 99 14
8 6 2 66 14
8 5 3 51 12
9 5 3 37 11
9 5 4 95 10
9 5 4 42 10
8 4 4 25 10
9 5 4 -14 10
9 4 5 -16 8
8 3 5 -55 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
8 3 5 -25 6
8 2 6 -63 6
8 1 7 -89 4
8 1 7 -166 4
Back
Top Bottom