Trump

I’ll wait until kash has his day in court before leaping to judgement. What is he charged with again?
What a shock that instead of taking the time to read something you deflect to what about ism.

It is a shame as I take the time to read or watch what you post and then respond directly to it rather than "what about this person"

I do like how you refuse to critically look at what is either clear grifting or , god forbid, a cover up.

I actually think this this the one thing that might hurt trump which, frany, is amazing.
 
What a shock that instead of taking the time to read something you deflect to what about ism.

It is a shame as I take the time to read or watch what you post and then respond directly to it rather than "what about this person"

I do like how you refuse to critically look at what is either clear grifting or , god forbid, a cover up.

I actually think is the one thing that might hurt trump which, frany, is amazing.
I honestly don’t think it is necessary to have a debate about every single post, because quite frankly (and as I have said before) no one is changing their minds.

Hopefully you would agree that neither side is perfect. What I am trying to do is illustrate the hypocrisy of non-stop Trump bashing given the many shortcomings on the other side, which hardly ever get any exposure. The same people who continually criticise trump were silent on the issue of Bidens mental capacity for office, for example. To me, having a president who appears to have been completely MIA is a far more serious issue than anything trump is accused of. All I see trump doing is trying to deliver on the promises he was democratically elected to deliver, but unfortunately is being blocked at every turn by democrats and politically appointed judges who are supposedly all for democracy. The hypocrisy is astounding.

In relation to the recent series of posts, in post #628 I highlighted that a number of democrats had been charged with vote harvesting, which seems like a fairly serious “threat to democracy” to me. There were crickets by way of response, which is fine by me, I’m not looking for, nor expect, anyone to go against their political bias and agree with me on anything. I’m just trying to provide balance.

You then posted (#632) something completely unrelated about kash/bongorno being grifters (in your mind), to which I responded on the basis there are grifters on both sides. You then complained (#635) that I didn’t agree with your post #632 and that I should have admitted the right sometimes gets it wrong. In post #637 I said I knew very little about kash/bongiorno so was in no position to agree or disagree with your view they are grifters. I then asked you about my post #628 (Democrat vote harvesters) to which you indicated you would hold judgement until they had their day in court (#638). But when I used that approach in my post #639 for kash/bongiorno you complained that I was deflecting.
 
I think there were some very dodgy deals involved in his earlier prosecution, but I don't believe it's part of a massive conspiracy.


What I do think is that a bunch of right-wing grifters pushed a conspiracy theory while they were out of office because it was a convenient cash cow. Now that they’re in a position of accountability, they’re being exposed for what many of them, like Patel / DanB truly are: grifters.
I recommend reading /watching some of Whitneys videos / articles.
She is not right or left wing but a great investigator.
 
I recommend reading /watching some of Whitneys videos / articles.
She is not right or left wing but a great investigator.
I think the comments attached to that article are more enlightening than the article itself, which just seems to be another anti Trump hit piece.
 
What a shock that instead of taking the time to read something you deflect to what about ism.

It is a shame as I take the time to read or watch what you post and then respond directly to it rather than "what about this person"

I do like how you refuse to critically look at what is either clear grifting or , god forbid, a cover up.

I actually think this this the one thing that might hurt trump which, frany, is amazing.
Don’t waste your time, he’s pro-Trump, he’s drank the koolaid, he’s part of the cult.

There’s no getting through to his type.
 
I honestly don’t think it is necessary to have a debate about every single post, because quite frankly (and as I have said before) no one is changing their minds.

Hopefully you would agree that neither side is perfect. What I am trying to do is illustrate the hypocrisy of non-stop Trump bashing given the many shortcomings on the other side, which hardly ever get any exposure. The same people who continually criticise trump were silent on the issue of Bidens mental capacity for office, for example. To me, having a president who appears to have been completely MIA is a far more serious issue than anything trump is accused of. All I see trump doing is trying to deliver on the promises he was democratically elected to deliver, but unfortunately is being blocked at every turn by democrats and politically appointed judges who are supposedly all for democracy. The hypocrisy is astounding.

In relation to the recent series of posts, in post #628 I highlighted that a number of democrats had been charged with vote harvesting, which seems like a fairly serious “threat to democracy” to me. There were crickets by way of response, which is fine by me, I’m not looking for, nor expect, anyone to go against their political bias and agree with me on anything. I’m just trying to provide balance.

You then posted (#632) something completely unrelated about kash/bongorno being grifters (in your mind), to which I responded on the basis there are grifters on both sides. You then complained (#635) that I didn’t agree with your post #632 and that I should have admitted the right sometimes gets it wrong. In post #637 I said I knew very little about kash/bongiorno so was in no position to agree or disagree with your view they are grifters. I then asked you about my post #628 (Democrat vote harvesters) to which you indicated you would hold judgement until they had their day in court (#638). But when I used that approach in my post #639 for kash/bongiorno you complained that I was deflecting.
Imagine if the effort that was put into this load of rubbish was put into actually answering one question honestly?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 17 14 0 3 108 32
2 Storm 15 11 0 4 202 28
3 Bulldogs 15 11 0 4 92 28
4 Warriors 15 10 0 5 11 26
5 Broncos 16 9 0 7 68 22
6 Sea Eagles 16 8 0 8 58 22
7 Sharks 17 9 0 8 8 22
8 Panthers 15 7 1 7 3 21
9 Dolphins 17 8 0 9 150 20
10 Roosters 15 7 0 8 14 20
11 Dragons 15 6 0 9 -49 18
12 Cowboys 16 6 1 9 -140 17
13 Knights 16 6 0 10 -67 16
14 Tigers 16 6 0 10 -82 16
15 Eels 15 5 0 10 -103 16
16 Rabbitohs 17 6 0 11 -129 16
17 Titans 15 4 0 11 -144 14
Back
Top Bottom