I honestly don’t think it is necessary to have a debate about every single post, because quite frankly (and as I have said before) no one is changing their minds.
Hopefully you would agree that neither side is perfect. What I am trying to do is illustrate the hypocrisy of non-stop Trump bashing given the many shortcomings on the other side, which hardly ever get any exposure. The same people who continually criticise trump were silent on the issue of Bidens mental capacity for office, for example. To me, having a president who appears to have been completely MIA is a far more serious issue than anything trump is accused of. All I see trump doing is trying to deliver on the promises he was democratically elected to deliver, but unfortunately is being blocked at every turn by democrats and politically appointed judges who are supposedly all for democracy. The hypocrisy is astounding.
In relation to the recent series of posts, in post #628 I highlighted that a number of democrats had been charged with vote harvesting, which seems like a fairly serious “threat to democracy” to me. There were crickets by way of response, which is fine by me, I’m not looking for, nor expect, anyone to go against their political bias and agree with me on anything. I’m just trying to provide balance.
You then posted (#632) something completely unrelated about kash/bongorno being grifters (in your mind), to which I responded on the basis there are grifters on both sides. You then complained (#635) that I didn’t agree with your post #632 and that I should have admitted the right sometimes gets it wrong. In post #637 I said I knew very little about kash/bongiorno so was in no position to agree or disagree with your view they are grifters. I then asked you about my post #628 (Democrat vote harvesters) to which you indicated you would hold judgement until they had their day in court (#638). But when I used that approach in my post #639 for kash/bongiorno you complained that I was deflecting.