Trump
- Thread starter lsz
- Start date
manlyfan76
Them / They
Seen a few articles that some republicans are getting annoyed with the lack of transparency on Epstein files, don't want to protect pedos.
I still think it's telling that orange man doesn't sue those who publicly say he is a pedo. Guy has sued over 4000 times.
I still think it's telling that orange man doesn't sue those who publicly say he is a pedo. Guy has sued over 4000 times.
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
That’s very selectively convenient.
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
No surprises here I guess. It’s not like he deserved it unlike Barack.
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
I see from the various responses that there is limited appetite for hearing opposing views. Fair enough. I tried. I must say the rules for what is acceptable for posting have also gotten quite convoluted.
Rather than risk posting something that doesn’t meet the accepted criteria, I will once again leave you all to it. Enjoy.
Rather than risk posting something that doesn’t meet the accepted criteria, I will once again leave you all to it. Enjoy.
The rules are in your own mind. In fact the only time I recall someone objecting to content was your several posts berating Budgie for not being respectful about that bloke who got shot in the RIP thread.
My comments here are about what I'm interested in, not what is 'acceptable'.
Post all your fox vids by all means, someone who doesn't have foxtel might watch them
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
That’s funny, I feel like “someone objects” to just about everything I post on here. All those “bad faith” warnings must be in my imagination. And I guess I assumed you were applying rules with your continual reference to how people should or shouldn’t post clips. Again, my mistake.
Lastly, you sure have a bee in your bonnet about the Charlie Kirk RIP thread. And for what it’s worth, I stand by my objection to the politicisation/denigration of the deceased in that thread. As I have now said several times to you, I believe the RIP thread is not the place for that (whilst at the time welcoming the debate in another more appropriate thread). If you think that’s “berating”, that’s on you.
I know you like having the final word, so over to you. Enjoy.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
If he was politicised and denigrated ... he politicised and denigrated himself!
All Budgie did was post his own exact words!
Your ideals of correct censorship were not met on that occasion, someone slipped by the censors with their offensive re-posting of the deceased's speech, tsk tsk, poor form.
No doubt you think for the appropriate mourning period for this beloved MAGA hero it would be better if we'd all used AI to make fake videos of him saying nice stuff instead?
Every now and then I'm reminded why I keep away from your posts in general forum, you'd think I'd have learned by now 🤷♂️
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
Not sure what you are talking about. If it’s the “objecting to content “ line, that was in response to SER8 saying the only time anyone has objected to content was me in the RIP thread, which is patently false. I couldn’t care less if someone objects to my posts - if I did, do you think I would still be around? If you are talking about the “bad faith” line, I must admit I find it odd for a mod to use that on what I consider to be legitimate and relevant posts. Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what you consider is in bad faith about my posts, apart from disagreeing with the content? Or not. Whatever.
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
It’s quite simple. Have the character assassination in one of the many political threads, but keep the RIP thread respectful. Or not. Whatever.
Brookie1973
Previously TerryRandall
Anyway, I will once again leave you all to your safe space echo chamber where everyone agrees with the party line and no dissenting views are allowed. Enjoy. Over and out.
You don't stop do you!! He assassinated his own character??????
Lol, everyone, out of respect for the departed please don't repeat anything he said for a period of (refer to chief censor Brookie for the correct waiting time)
Sorry missed this one as well
Bad faith example is stating rules for what to post in a an inference that your views or posts are against the rules. Remind me where there have been examples where your posts have been deleted or moderated in any fashion?
Yes we all have views on them but is that the rule you do not like?
See bad faith is posting like this to create a perception that is just not there
Cliffycomeback
Reserve Grader
Link above is an article about a recruitment drive for ICE. It claims the US Government has set a quota for deportations at 3000 illegal immigrants a day. Big numbers if true.
47MVEagle
First Grader
Oh, so you mean you want that thread whitewashed so only good things are said about Charlie Kirk?
A bit like what you want this thread to be like re: Trump.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
24 | 19 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
|
24 | 17 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
|
24 | 16 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
|
24 | 15 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
|
24 | 15 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
|
24 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
|
24 | 13 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
|
24 | 13 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
|
24 | 12 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
|
24 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
|
24 | 10 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
|
24 | 9 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
|
24 | 9 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
|
24 | 9 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
|
24 | 8 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
|
24 | 6 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
|
24 | 6 | 18 | -300 | 18 |