Trump

This is why i have stopped in this thread.

I agree with some of the points raised like there should have been more scrutiny of Bidens health, that there was a failure on the border policy and there needed to be some investigation into gov waste (not the DOGE thing) but I can not deal with the whatabout everytime a point is raised
You mean like the several “what abouts” in your post immediately preceding this one?

All my recent posts have been directly related to news pertaining to the Trump presidency. Believe me, there are plenty of “what abouts” I could talk about, like “what about Democrat approval ratings at a 35 year low” but as I said before, it’s rather pointless.
 
This is why i have stopped in this thread.

I agree with some of the points raised like there should have been more scrutiny of Bidens health, that there was a failure on the border policy and there needed to be some investigation into gov waste (not the DOGE thing) but I can not deal with the whatabout everytime a point is raised
Nor should you have to deal with it, it's a diversion tactic, not an honest exchange e of ideas.

I've made a number of posts n this thread and in no way am I a defender of the Democrats!

The suggestions that Trump is the same as the Dems but just with different policies is absurd and even Trump himself would say that. He is also not the same as the traditional Republican Party, which again even he would agree with.

Yet our friend does not, it seems.
 
Last edited:
Nor should you have to deal with it, it's a diversion tactic, not an honest exchange e of ideas.

I've made a number of posts n this thread and in no way am I a defender of the Democrats!

The suggestions that Trump is the same as the Dems but just with different policies is absurd and even Trump himself would say that. He is also not the same as the traditional Republican Party, which again even he would agree with.

Yet our friend does not, it seems.
When have I ever said Trump is the same as the Democrats just with different policies? He is as far from a Democrat as you can get. I think you have misunderstood my attempt to shift the conversion away from “Orange man bad” to actual policies. But when I asked what Trump policies people disagree with, the only response I got was perhaps ICE was being too zealous in carrying out its duties.

If you are convinced Trump is “bad” and should not be President on that basis, fair enough. Just own it and we can dispense with arguing the pros and cons of specific policies, such as tariff reform, as clearly that will get us nowhere.
 
@h27272727 and @lsz – interested to hear what you (or anyone else) thinks of Trump’s various moves to concentrate power in the presidency?

Eg a cabinet full of people whose loyalty appears to be to him alone. Kneecapping Congress and the courts. As well as the media, universities, even the right of protest.

Is this really happening? And if so, is it a problem, or is there actually merit to an 'emperor' system?

Should we go for an emperor in Aus too???
 
@h27272727 and @lsz – interested to hear what you (or anyone else) thinks of Trump’s various moves to concentrate power in the presidency?

Eg a cabinet full of people whose loyalty appears to be to him alone. Kneecapping Congress and the courts. As well as the media, universities, even the right of protest.

Is this really happening? And if so, is it a problem, or is there actually merit to an 'emperor' system?

Should we go for an emperor in Aus too???
A classic diversionary tactic. Are these leading questions Counsellor?
 
@h27272727 and @lsz – interested to hear what you (or anyone else) thinks of Trump’s various moves to concentrate power in the presidency?

Eg a cabinet full of people whose loyalty appears to be to him alone. Kneecapping Congress and the courts. As well as the media, universities, even the right of protest.

Is this really happening? And if so, is it a problem, or is there actually merit to an 'emperor' system?

Should we go for an emperor in Aus too???
I think the way Trump has used the DOJ and his continual ignorance of "norms" is a concern.

As one person on FOX put it when they were celebrating the influence of Trump on the alleged cancellation of Colbert Republicans seem to forget that they are not going to be in power for ever...
 
I think the way Trump has used the DOJ and his continual ignorance of "norms" is a concern.

As one person on FOX put it when they were celebrating the influence of Trump on the alleged cancellation of Colbert Republicans seem to forget that they are not going to be in power for ever...
Good point.
Trump is pretty old and may begin to lose interest in continuing beyond this term but (thanks to the Supreme Court) whoever is Pres from now on can basically decide to assassinate an American political opponent if they think it's 'in the national interest'. (I specify American because obviously the US already has a storied history of assassinating foreign opponents supposedly on those grounds)
 
Good point.
Trump is pretty old and may begin to lose interest in continuing beyond this term but (thanks to the Supreme Court) whoever is Pres from now on can basically decide to assassinate an American political opponent if they think it's 'in the national interest'. (I specify American because obviously the US already has a storied history of assassinating foreign opponents supposedly on those grounds)
Also the blatant corruption and political influence in places like the FCC. That one especially surprises me considering the Republicans are the "free speech" kings
 
@h27272727 and @lsz – interested to hear what you (or anyone else) thinks of Trump’s various moves to concentrate power in the presidency?

Eg a cabinet full of people whose loyalty appears to be to him alone. Kneecapping Congress and the courts. As well as the media, universities, even the right of protest.

Is this really happening? And if so, is it a problem, or is there actually merit to an 'emperor' system?

Should we go for an emperor in Aus too???
Trump or Xi Jinping? Sounds more like commie China every day doesn't it?
 
Does anyone know for sure if the clause to be able to disregard the courts got passed with the big bill?
Honestly I am not sure about the whole bill thing so have not really commented on it.

I do like the talk of Trump the deal maker.

What he says

“Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,” Trump said Thursday. “They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let’s call it seed money.”

He said 90% of any profits from the money invested would go to the U.S. even if Japan had put up the funds. “It’s not a loan or anything, it’s a signing bonus,”

And what the Japanese say

But Japanese officials said only 1% or 2% of the total – a maximum $11 billion — would be investment, with the rest essentially made up of loans. And they said the 90%-10% profit split in America’s favor highlighted by Trump’s team only applies to that smaller investment portion.

I never in my life seen someone who tells that many mis truths
 
It’s good to see all you guys back.

Unfortunately, I am going to have to agree with the general thrust of these posts - it’s all pretty pointless. Clearly where each side chooses to get their media/information is just a means to justify a pre existing position. Most of the recent media I have seen indicates that the Trump presidency is kicking goals in a number of areas. On tariffs, when even CNN is forced to admit successes, I take that as a strong pointer that things are going ok. On Obama/Clinton, I think Tulsi Gabbard is very impressive and has made a strong case, which if true, is the greatest political scandal in history, but has apparently gone essentially unreported on leftist media. Honest question - do you ever question that perhaps what you are being fed is extremely one-sided propaganda rather than news? I know that’s what you think those on the Trump side are guilty of, but do you ever consider that you may also be in the same boat?
I don't use facebook/twitter. Sometimes I read a few forums briefly when an interesting new topic pops up (iran, epstein, etc.). The conservative threads tend to be much more concerning and slanted. Some very significant topics don't reach their pages. Plenty of comments tend to branch off into some conspiracy, xenophobic rant or other unfounded arguments/fears. Substantially more moderation / censoring, selective news intake, clickbait titles, fewer references to statistics/facts.

I question everything. I question it again and again. But I don't know who is feeding me what unless its in my sleep... I often come to disagree with my former self with time. Critical thinking is questioning and reflecting. In science, for example, it is an understanding that your current model is just that - a model. It is the most accurate one available at the time and can always be improved with more information or an alternate perspective. But despite some theories being disproved / improved upon with time, this is not justification for discrediting all scientific knowledge. I think that draws some parallels to the US currently.

I haven't read said article - am happy to do so, but admittedly doubt it will include anything too substantial. When it comes to tariffs, that is not a topic for debate. I just explained how they work. That's something you either learn in school (/after) or you don't. You can wet your finger and hold it to the wind to try gauge it, but that's only going to get so far.

EU wants 0 tariff, yet Trump wants a large tariff. They compromised at 15% because EU wants to export products to US and US needs EU products. Longer it drags on, longer both suffer for no reason. Perhaps the CNN article hinted he "got his way". Trump can 'get his way' all he likes and still leave the US a mess.

The whole "tariffs will make us rich" and "other countries will pay it!" nonsense is baseless and intentionally vague. Hence why so many conservatives online never go into any great detail about what they are or how in the hell they somehow manage to be a good thing when applied universally (with percentages essentially pulled out of a hat). Part of me is glad they don't bother because the internet can only support so many mental gymnasts.

First statement has a slight element of truth to it from a US govt perspective (with a big asterisk). US govt will now collect much more tax from US citizens (disproportionately, the middle class). See my last post if not sure why. But with blanket inflation / increased cost of living people stop buying. Dollar has been losing substantial value too.

Look, my opinion on Tulsi Gabbard is that she is an incompetent, shameless stain and a total sycophant. I would maybe consider talking about her comments but Trump and co have thrown out so much trash over this past week and a half to try stir up a reaction. Even in most conservative forums ive been viewing they've discussed the likely reality that they are clutching at straws to try distract from the Epstein situation. The boy who cried wolf effect is coming into play and despite throwing a bunch of **** at the wall, not much is sticking.
 
Last edited:
I was being flippant. From what I can tell there are a couple of communism loyalists posting how Trump appears to be doing all the things that every communist dictator does.
I haven't been keeping up but if you're referring to me here that statement is pretty wild. I wouldn't vote for a communist party, or even a socialist party for that matter. Ironically I believe the tangent about discussing these concepts came from a comment made by myself claiming how there's a point on both the left and right wing where the ideologies converge more loosely to hatred / dictatorship (end not the means) than political policy and that Trump was starting to push the boundaries.

Me and another poster eventually went on a tangent comparing the significant differences between Socialism/Communism/Social Democracy. I agreed with a claim made in an article referenced by this poster, something like 'Socialism never works in practice'. Another poster and I then got into a separate tangent where we discussed how this perspective may become outdated in the future as things such as tech/automation continue to develop and the concepts adapt/develop further. If I really have to spell it out, i'm not a Communist, nor a communist loyalist...
 
I don't use facebook/twitter. Sometimes I read a few forums briefly when an interesting new topic pops up (iran, epstein, etc.). The conservative threads tend to be much more concerning and slanted. Some very significant topics don't reach their pages. Plenty of comments tend to branch off into some conspiracy, xenophobic rant or other unfounded arguments/fears. Substantially more moderation / censoring, selective news intake, clickbait titles, fewer references to statistics/facts.

I question everything. I question it again and again. But I don't know who is feeding me what unless its in my sleep... I often come to disagree with my former self with time. Critical thinking is questioning and reflecting. In science, for example, it is an understanding that your current model is just that - a model. It is the most accurate one available at the time and can always be improved with more information or an alternate perspective. But despite some theories being disproved / improved upon with time, this is not justification for discrediting all scientific knowledge. I think that draws some parallels to the US currently.

I haven't read said article - am happy to do so, but admittedly doubt it will include anything too substantial. When it comes to tariffs, that is not a topic for debate. I just explained how they work. That's something you either learn in school (/after) or you don't. You can wet your finger and hold it to the wind to try gauge it, but that's only going to get so far.

EU wants 0 tariff, yet Trump wants a large tariff. They compromised at 15% because EU wants to export products to US and US needs EU products. Longer it drags on, longer both suffer for no reason. Perhaps the CNN article hinted he "got his way". Trump can 'get his way' all he likes and still leave the US a mess.

The whole "tariffs will make us rich" and "other countries will pay it!" nonsense is baseless and intentionally vague. Hence why so many conservatives online never go into any great detail about what they are or how in the hell they somehow manage to be a good thing when applied universally (with percentages essentially pulled out of a hat). Part of me is glad they don't bother because the internet can only support so many mental gymnasts.

First statement has a slight element of truth to it from a US govt perspective (with a big asterisk). US govt will now collect much more tax from US citizens (disproportionately, the middle class). See my last post if not sure why. But with blanket inflation / increased cost of living people stop buying. Dollar has been losing substantial value too.

Look, my opinion on Tulsi Gabbard is that she is an incompetent, shameless stain and a total sycophant. I would maybe consider talking about her comments but Trump and co have thrown out so much trash over this past week and a half to try stir up a reaction. Even in most conservative forums ive been viewing they've discussed the likely reality that they are clutching at straws to try distract from the Epstein situation. The boy who cried wolf effect is coming into play and despite throwing a bunch of **** at the wall, not much is sticking.
This looks pretty impressive to me;

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 19 16 0 3 158 36
2 Bulldogs 18 14 0 4 136 34
3 Storm 18 13 0 5 222 32
4 Warriors 18 12 0 6 28 30
5 Panthers 18 10 1 7 79 27
6 Broncos 18 10 0 8 78 26
7 Sharks 19 11 0 8 23 26
8 Dolphins 18 9 0 9 169 24
9 Sea Eagles 18 9 0 9 22 24
10 Roosters 18 8 0 10 4 22
11 Cowboys 19 7 1 11 -157 19
12 Dragons 18 6 0 12 -64 18
13 Tigers 19 7 0 12 -135 18
14 Eels 18 6 0 12 -147 18
15 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 16
16 Titans 18 5 0 13 -149 16
17 Rabbitohs 19 6 0 13 -151 16
Back
Top Bottom