And that’s the most annoying thing. If it’s true that senior players went to management to voice their concerns about the coach and management’s response was to extend the coach’s contract, did they really expect a good outcomeThe coach has obviously lost the dressing room.
This cant be allowed to fester further!!!
No no no,nothing wrong at the club,just injuries and salary cap restraints.Everything behind the scenes is running smoothly and the coach is top shelf.Nevermind the fact DCE wanted out,Ennis and Daley rejected offers and the board isnt happy that the chairman is also part of the ownership.Everything is going swimmingly.Dont forget,50% is something to be proud ofWeidler reporting AGAIN that he's not happy at Manly and Superleague clubs have been told he's open to offers.
Hopefully Weidler is wrong again.
Regardless, there's way too much wrong with our club
You couldn’t do it because you have to spend 95% of the cap in the rules.Is there are more equitable way to pay players than a straight salary?
For example; Pay a player a salary of $400,000 per season plus, say, $20,000 per match?
Sure, the club would have to leave sufficient space in the Cap to cover the player for maximum participation.
Several clubs, including ours, have been disadvantaged in the Cap by players getting long-term injuries near the start of the season. Tent, Froggy and Al are three examples, but what about the 'Fins having to pay Fleggler full whack for the past two seasons when he hasn't played a match?
Is such a payment arrangement legal under the ciurrent Cap laws?
At least he’s ruled himself out of the Ashes tour
The numbers floated regarding to re-signing is closer to 1.3milwe cant afford the trbojevics thats the bottom line their last deal crippled the club on the field. its just too much money collectively just to keep tom your talking 2.4m+ You could literally buy any star player in the comp for that money.
Couldn’t you say the same about Des regarding Foran’s last game?And that’s the most annoying thing. If it’s true that senior players went to management to voice their concerns about the coach and management’s response was to extend the coach’s contract, did they really expect a good outcome
When certain players turned up their performance for dce’s 350 it was evident that the team are more than capable they just weren’t putting in for the coach/club in previous games to make a point
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |