Two Bulldogs players stood down.

[globaleagle]

Explosive reason Bulldogs players were stood down

Club in crisis over school girl scandal

wwos.nine.com.au

The Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs have stood down young stars Corey Harawira-Naera and Jayden Okunbor.

The club issued the following statement:

"Corey Harawira-Naera and Jayden Okunbor have been stood down by the Bulldogs after each was issued a show cause notice by the NRL as to why they shouldn't face further disciplinary action for alleged breaches of the Game's Code of Conduct," the statement read.

 

[The Wheel]

Guessing Shoddy will apply his discretion in regards to his old club

 

[globaleagle]

So... it's either pretty bad as Todd will let Sivo play, or

wrong club to screw up in guys! (though Todd has a soft spot for the dogs doesn't he?)

 

[SeaEagleRock8]

Not subject of criminal investigation...so...gambling?

 

[globaleagle]

Not subject of criminal investigation...so...gambling?

Ohh... maybe!

Or they said they want their next contract to be with Parra...

 

[Nice Beaver]

Not subject of criminal investigation...so...gambling?

That's what I heard.

Allegedly of course.

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

Guessing Shoddy will apply his discretion in regards to his old club

In , 3,2, 1........

 

[Fibro Eagle]

If it is gambling ,was it on the nines or last season ?
Depending on size of bets and outcomes of the bets , minimum 2 weeks suspension

 

[Chip and Chase]

If it is gambling ,was it on the nines or last season ?
Depending on size of bets and outcomes of the bets , minimum 2 weeks suspension

Wolfie got half a season didn't he ?? I don't think size of bet comes into it - their main concern is whether you participate in the game that you laid the bet on - which was Wolfman's downfall even though from memory the bets weren't ones that could be match fixed.

 

[The Wheel]

Gambling or Bondi Snow?

 

[Fibro Eagle]

Wolfie got half a season didn't he ?? I don't think size of bet comes into it - their main concern is whether you participate in the game that you laid the bet on - which was Wolfman's downfall even though from memory the bets weren't ones that could be match fixed.

Yes Wolfman got rest of season from July or there about , I just recall that other players only got a couple weeks in the past

 

[Nice Beaver]

That's what I heard.

Allegedly of course.

Allegedly indeed.

Now reported they brought high school girls back to team hotel in Port Macquarie.

Not saying they did anything with said girls and all allegedly of course

 

[The Wheel]

Allegedly indeed.

Now reported they brought high school girls back to team hotel in Port Macquarie.

Not saying they did anything with said girls and all allegedly of course

Port is down the road from Coffs

 

[The Who]

Allegedly indeed.

Now reported they brought high school girls back to team hotel in Port Macquarie.

Not saying they did anything with said girls and all allegedly of course

Sounds like an over-reaction to me. For once I'm on the side of the Dogs' players unless, of course, the girls weren't willing participants.

 

[Cameron]

Media twisting the truth. Both girls were over 18

 

[Snake]

Media twisting the truth. Both girls were over 18

I wonder how you'd feel if you had a daughter and a Rugby League team pay her school an official visit and you find out later that she met up with two of the players at their hotel room later that night?

It's not a good look for the club or the NRL. They are there to promote the game, not pick up chicks. Also, legal age of consent is 16 so we don't know if they were over 18 or not. It is not a good look either way.

There is no evidence to say anything happened outside of a conversation but it's still not a good look.

 

[40 nil]

Paul Kent describes as 'some sort of short term relationship with a couple of schoolgirls'

 

[Disco]

Yeah its not great

 

[Cameron]

I wonder how you'd feel if you had a daughter and a Rugby League team pay her school an official visit and you find out later that she met up with two of the players at their hotel room later that night?

It's not a good look for the club or the NRL. They are there to promote the game, not pick up chicks. Also, legal age of consent is 16 so we don't know if they were over 18 or not. It is not a good look either way.

There is no evidence to say anything happened outside of a conversation but it's still not a good look.

Understand what you are saying and don’t disagree. My issue in the media sensationalism. They were over 18 in the eyes of the law they are adults. Good on the dogs for not going all Greenberg and sweeping it under the carpet.

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

Understand what you are saying and don’t disagree. My issue in the media sensationalism. They were over 18 in the eyes of the law they are adults. Good on the dogs for not going all Greenberg and sweeping it under the carpet.

Be sure they know they’ll have him in their corner anyway.......well maybe or maybe not too!