The AFL put up around 4 million for the women's league. I think that's around 1% of the current TV deal (per year)If the women's comp is self funding , then it's OK i suppose, but I doubt very much that it will be self sustaining, meaning a larger drain on the NRL and clubs also, all because Greenberg feels that he has to be politically correct all the time.
It's not true equality when you have been told that you can't/shouldn't play league since its inception. It's taken over 100 years for men's league to get where it is today (f****d as it is) and we're not talking about giving 50% of the funds - its nowhere near that!Once you attract enough paying fans, take it to the networks and see if they want to pay for it. That's true equality.
They get a leg up because women have been systematically denied access to things that men have access and right to for generationsWhere did I say 50%? And you have just proven my point - it took the men's game 100 years to get to this point, but women get a leg-up to the same position (a nationally funded, televised competition) in a couple of years, with zero runs on the board. But that's typical of today's "entitlement" generation. Where is the nationally televised men's netball comp?
You forgot women's hockey,hmmmmmmI support women’s sport ... if a little girl wants to play footy then great! Big fan of women’s golf, tennis, cricket, surfing, soccer etc. Elyse Perry one of my favourite sports stars
If you were CEO, you would prioritise funding for a woman's comp over the myriad funding needs of the "mens" game - eg bush footy, surburban grounds, half the clubs broke or funded by the NRL, lower grades, etc etc? Greenturd has down zip since he's been in charge, but this obvious chance at virtue signalling he manages to get up and running at the speed of light.
Level playing field? What a load of pc bs. Why is there such a need to politicise sport?? Let's demand a men's Olympic synchronised swimming team just so there can be equal opportunity and access for all...They get a leg up because women have been systematically denied access to things that men have access and right to for generations. It's about accepting that fact and trying to restore things to a level playing field so women can grow up with equal opportunities as men.
And don't get me started on netball!
In women’s rugby league I always bet (via Lottoland) against the the heterosexual team.
Yeah that's sounds fair. Would love to see how that pans out with boxing, rugby league, afl, nfl...The other option I guess is to make all sports gender neutral ... ie not men’s or women’s golf just golf. Much fairer.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 94 | 16 |
2 | Raiders | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 14 |
3 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
4 | Storm | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 54 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
16 | Titans | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -88 | 6 |
17 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |