Ron E. Gibbs
First Grader
He'd still do a better job than most of our starting forwards.David Hosking is 61yrs old 😉
He'd still do a better job than most of our starting forwards.David Hosking is 61yrs old 😉
That could work well, especially if we have some unused Prime benefits.There all Temu Turbos now. Suggest we jump on Amazon and get some new players with next day free delivery for prime members.
Perfect, he'll fit straight in, prob play better than the lots we have and last longer.David Hosking is 61yrs old 😉
He was a mule. Some of our current crew are donkeys.He'd still do a better job than most of our starting forwards.
Can’t see any strategy at all.Not defending Seibold but I believe he is at best just a contributor in our recruitment strategy. If there is an issue the buck stops with Mestrov who heads up our strategy.
He'd fit right in with current mob then.David Hosking is 61yrs old 😉
Someone mentioned a few weeks ago that we are 😃Why aren't we lining up some of these young warriors forwards they all look to have talent.
Its not our pathway, its our ownerI keep watching the NRL this season and almost every club are blooding young players.
Except Manly.
Unless we change our pathways, we will be battling to stay out of spoon calculation in the coming years.
More like a pathway out of the club for Gordie you mean.Classic example iof our pathetic pathways is GCKT. Pouring development into a guy who is clearly too small and too slow to ever play top level nrl.
I keep watching the NRL this season and almost every club are blooding young players.
Except Manly.
Unless we change our pathways, we will be battling to stay out of spoon calculation in the coming years.
I can’t understand why Pua’avase & Patolo haven’t yet been given a go?We will pick up a few of the dregs that cant make it at their current clubs.
Its the new Manly way.
Arko, the old Manly way, would have have picked the eyes out them and signed any who might be worth grabbing.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 20 |
2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
3 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 16 |
4 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
6 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 14 |
7 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 13 |
8 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 12 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 12 |
10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 12 |
11 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 12 |
12 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 10 |
13 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
14 | Eels | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | -79 | 10 |
15 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 10 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
17 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |