Absolutely, especially on mad monday.
Darren link said:interesting that no Manly player in top 17!! With us having no salary cap we have been caught out paying overs for players not ranked in top category. Foran and Matai wouldn't make Aussie team either so to be on the cap limit we must be paying big bucks!
Glenn, Kite, Wolfman would be on big overs!! Probably Robbo after 2008 gf.
Darren link said:Foran and Matai wouldn't make Aussie team either
Darren link said:interesting that no Manly player in top 17!! With us having no salary cap we have been caught out paying overs for players not ranked in top category. Foran and Matai wouldn't make Aussie team either so to be on the cap limit we must be paying big bucks!
Glenn, Kite, Wolfman would be on big overs!! Probably Robbo after 2008 gf.
Ryan link said:[quote author=Darren link=topic=185892.msg305492#msg305492 date=1289357014]
interesting that no Manly player in top 17!! With us having no salary cap we have been caught out paying overs for players not ranked in top category. Foran and Matai wouldn't make Aussie team either so to be on the cap limit we must be paying big bucks!
Glenn, Kite, Wolfman would be on big overs!! Probably Robbo after 2008 gf.
jjai link said:its an nrl thing.. if you are a kiwi in an nrl club who is suspended it still counts but if he was in super league i dont think it does..
The Boot link said:As far as I understand it is that the NZ squad wasn't named prior to Matai's suspension. If the squad had been officially named with him in it & then he gets suspended, you'd then have a good case for serving the suspension during the Four Nations and any subsequent Tests.
Fro link said:Plenty of incumbents didn't make the squads rusty.
Fro link said:i agree in Matais case, but we arent the NZ selectors, so cant really say he would have been categorically, much as we'd like it to be so 🙂
Shane link said:[quote author=Fro link=topic=185892.msg305585#msg305585 date=1289437811]
i agree in Matais case, but we arent the NZ selectors, so cant really say he would have been categorically, much as we'd like it to be so 🙂
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
3 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
4 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |