Eagles2nv said:Fozza is back at training. This was posted on NRlL.com, thought you might be interested.
http://www.nrl.com/we-can-go-back-to-back-foran/tabid/10874/newsid/65657/default.aspx
I think we're going to win the comp. every year....I've been right a few times too.Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 26 |
2 | Raiders | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 24 |
3 | Warriors | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 24 |
4 | Storm | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 171 | 22 |
5 | Sharks | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 18 |
6 | Dolphins | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 146 | 16 |
7 | Broncos | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 16 |
8 | Roosters | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | -18 | 16 |
9 | Panthers | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -9 | 15 |
10 | Cowboys | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -106 | 15 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 14 |
12 | Dragons | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -59 | 14 |
13 | Tigers | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -62 | 14 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -88 | 14 |
15 | Knights | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | -69 | 12 |
16 | Eels | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -105 | 12 |
17 | Titans | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -122 | 12 |