How will Suzanne Young go as the new COO?
- Thread starter Daddycool08
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
-
We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
niccipops said:Brookie4eva said:
What's that smell? Oh, it's you Todd. Carry on.
I can assure you that her and Toddy will have many a long chat about their mutual love of all things Belmore. Mark my words, this appointment will end in tears. If you thought the Bulldogs got favourable treatment until now, you aint seen nothin yet!
Ralphie said:
So it's part of the must achieve GF victory checklist.
Roosters - check
Bunnies - check
Bulldogs - still waiting
Though, the general league public seems to be pretty over Greenberg so it would be very damaging for him if there was an increase in favourable treatment/questionable judiciary decisions and selective fines to certain clubs.
Suzanne has my benefit of the doubt so far. She deserves a go.
Even though I would have been a far better choice.
Hamster Huey
Space Invader
lsz said:
She named the kids Hughes, Mortimer and Lamb.
Daddycool08
Reserve Grader
Hamster Huey said:
I suppose if she had a fourth kid it would be named Mint Sauce.
EagleFromMay1967
Sky Punching : send them High as the Clouds
Moore ?Daddycool08 said:Hamster Huey said:
I suppose if she had a fourth kid it would be named Mint Sauce.
Duff
Bencher
I like the fact that she hasn't worked for any club before as I would prefer all outsiders in these roles. If it is confirmed that she is a Canterbury supporter, there is always going to be suspicion.
I like that David Smith is from o/s. If they need game specific input, it can come from the clubs because at least there's no hiding allegiances and then the impartial outsiders can sum up the information using purely the facts without preconceptions or bias.
I like that David Smith is from o/s. If they need game specific input, it can come from the clubs because at least there's no hiding allegiances and then the impartial outsiders can sum up the information using purely the facts without preconceptions or bias.
Daddycool08
Reserve Grader
Ralphie said:
So the dogs may get even more favourable decisions? I certainly hope not. Let's hope she is at least fair in her dealings with other clubs.
So ... the appointment is tokenism because females in management positions in sport is always just tokenism? That would be a pretty powerful argument if you had included the whole 9 yardas.faithful said:
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11 | 9 | 2 | 82 | 20 |
|
11 | 8 | 3 | 112 | 18 |
|
11 | 8 | 3 | 75 | 18 |
|
11 | 7 | 4 | 65 | 16 |
|
12 | 7 | 5 | 135 | 14 |
|
12 | 7 | 5 | 57 | 14 |
|
11 | 6 | 5 | -9 | 14 |
|
11 | 6 | 5 | -38 | 14 |
|
12 | 6 | 5 | 36 | 13 |
|
11 | 5 | 6 | 47 | 12 |
|
12 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 12 |
|
11 | 5 | 6 | -88 | 12 |
|
12 | 5 | 6 | -3 | 11 |
|
11 | 3 | 8 | -89 | 8 |
|
11 | 3 | 8 | -119 | 8 |
|
11 | 2 | 9 | -95 | 6 |
|
11 | 2 | 9 | -170 | 6 |
