The Who
Journey Man
This was ridiculous. It was for repeated infringements, yet it happened a long time after the last penalty and was not for a 'repeat' offence. It was for tackling a player without the ball.
Now, it is all very well for a ref to say "the next player who infringes is off" but that ruling must only apply if the offence is the same ie. defending on the goal line, and surely there is a time limit to which it applies.
Now, it is all very well for a ref to say "the next player who infringes is off" but that ruling must only apply if the offence is the same ie. defending on the goal line, and surely there is a time limit to which it applies.