Is it all a big game or con to take Manly from Brookvale to the Central Coast?
Are we being decimated by losing players, sponsors and other key items so that we'll be left with no other choice but to relocate?
The NRL would be pleased in having one less team in Sydney. Maybe the NRL would then kick in a few bucks to cover relocation expenses.
People can say that Brookvale (and even Penn has said) is our spiritual home and there are no plans to leave it. But if sufficient 'pressure' is brought to bear we may have little or no choice but to move.
The NRL is still very keen to rid Sydney of a team and wants all games played out of the three Sydney stadia. Also the travel to these stadia is very inconvenient for those on the northern beaches. I've heard sentiments to the affect by other forum posters in the past.
We all know we can draw up plans for the redevelopment of Brookvale and we can even have a ten-year plan for the club. But equally plans can change or not come to fruition.
If the end-game is to get out of Sydney and go to the Central Coast this seems a good way to get it done and save face regardless of the next few years. "Oh, our hands were tied and we had no option." Leaving the NRL as the villain and the Sea Eagles as the injured party thrown a life-line to keep operating and then sure up the future of the team.
The current fan-base will hate it but there are a whole lot of other fans that'll embrace the team especially if there is no other choice being thrown at the club.
I am no conspiracy theorist (in general) but from what you know are the administration and the owners doing a good job for the club? If you say they are fine but if you think they are not, then why not? Is some other factor at work here? Watch this space...
Now on a lighter note - where is my tin-foil hat?
