Parks n Harper - you have competition

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
  • Wwe are currently experience some server issues which I am working through and hoping to resolve soon, Please bare with me whilst I work through making some changes and possible intermittent outages.
  • Apologies all our server was runing rogue. I managed to get us back to a point from 2:45 today though there is an attachment issue i will fix shortly. Things should be smooth now though

Mitch

Bencher
I don't really know, but I think Harper & Parker would be @ $300k. I expect that Koula would attract the biggest offers for a long term contract, esp. after he debuts in the NRL. Fortunately, we have signed him till the end of 2024.
Yep Koula attracted a very good offer from the Warriors last year (Roughly 1.2m over 3 years), only to knock that back and re-sign with Manly.
 

40 nil

It's only a game ...
Yes, it would be nice to have speed to burn across the backline but that's the beauty of Rugby League, the unfashionables get to play on the same field as the super stars.
That's true.

However, can our current centres win us a comp? If so, it would break the mold of our previous premiership teams which all had top flight centres. Despite the game changing in recent years, having pace across the backline is still a big plus for any team seeking premiership glory.

2011 - Lyon & Matai
2008 - Bell & Matai
1996 - Hill & Innes
1987 - O'Connor & Williams
1978 - Knight & Gartner
1976 - Fulton & Gartner
1973 - Fulton & Branighan
1972 - Fulton & Branighan
 
Last edited:

StuBoot

Bencher
That's true.

However, can our current centres win us a comp? If so, it would break the mold of our previous premiership teams which all had top flight centres. Despite the game changing in recent years, having pace across the backline is still a big plus for any team seeking premiership glory.

2011 - Lyon & Matai
2008 - Bell & Matai
1996 - Hill & Innes
1987 - O'Connor & Williams
1978 - Knight & Gartner
1976 - Fulton & Gartner
1973 - Fulton & Branighan
1972 - Fulton & Branighan
I get that but the centre role has changed a bit even over the past five years.
At a guess between our wingers and centres they probably scored 60odd tries last season.
Would we score any more if we had faster centres?
Maybe, maybe not. They’d probably just share the spoils.
 

40 nil

It's only a game ...
I get that but the centre role has changed a bit even over the past five years.
At a guess between our wingers and centres they probably scored 60odd tries last season.
Would we score any more if we had faster centres?
Maybe, maybe not. They’d probably just share the spoils.
Yes, you are correct. There were 65 tries scored by our three quarters - Saab 26, Garrick 23, Parker 8, Harper 8. Last night, I watched highlights of a few matches in which Harper scored some very good tries - a mixture of hole running, evasive skills & strength. However, nearly all were against weaker sides with poor defence.

I agree that having a faster centre wouldn't necessarily equate to more tries - maybe Saab would score less. However, I think having a fast evasive player capable of breaking the line would help us get on the front foot from our own end. DCE is capable of doing this, but it occurred more regularly when he was younger & faster. Also, Fainu could do this with his elusive dummy half running. Currently, I don't think we have any player doing this regularly (not even Turbo) through their own ability (without a line break assist). I think most teams have at least player of this type who can break the line to help get them out of trouble at their own end.

IMO, it works having one 'reliable' centre who is strong defensively and runs lines to score tries, but it would be better if the other is a strike centre (who can defend) - the team would be much stronger. Of course, the best scenario is having both centres strong in both facets of the game. All our great centres of the past were like this.
 

Brookie Bob

"I come back to you now at the turn of the tide"
I get that but the centre role has changed a bit even over the past five years.
This!

Let's look at the Panthers, Bunnies, Storm and Roosters centres for this year - obviously all still contenders for the trophy this year - like us, and the best yardstick we have. If these teams have these particular players in the centre position, obviously they trust them to do the job. (I've put in players from each team who may be listed on their club site as 'winger', but may have played a lot of centre as well):

Panthers:

Bunnies:

Storm:

Roosters:


The only 3 out of that lot that I would take with almost complete certainty to do a better job / have more upside, more consistantly than Parker / Harper as a centre would be (in order) Manu from the Roosters, Olam from the Storm and Crichton from the Panthers.

Surprisingly - or maybe not - centre seems to be a position where even so-called 'top clubs' have little depth / experience / 'star power' going into 2022.

Penrith look ok, even after Burton's loss. The Bunnies look like a star-power black hole in the centres without Gagai. The Drizzle will have to rely on Olam and probably Reimis Smith - injuries will test them in the outside backs this year. Even the Roosters - who supposedly have a lot of depth this year - will be relying on the versatile Manu and 'somebody' to put up their hand in the trials.

Also - I don't see much in the way of 'strike' centres in the above list; someone who can make a try out of nothing, when there's nothing on and the defense is tight (think Gasnier, Fulton, O'Connor, Jamie Lyon). No length of the field tries from that lot above, not really even from Manu, Olam and Crichton; even they are best as 'finishers' and being very sound defensively.

Which is (hopefully) what we have already at Manly in Parker & Harper (and probably on less $$). I can't fault the attitude or application of either, and I (quietly) think Harper in particular is set to go up a gear this year. Harper has a couple of young mouths to feed - and he's young himself - and I think we'll see Harper bust a gut in self-improvement and application to make his mark for those he cares for.

'Kouca' Koula may be the next 'real thing' - but I'll leave it to Des as to when he gets a full-time first grade gig. His time will definitely come. We're fortunate to have him waiting in the wings - to be a centre (or...........fullback). :cool:
 

40 nil

It's only a game ...
Also - I don't see much in the way of 'strike' centres in the above list; someone who can make a try out of nothing, when there's nothing on and the defense is tight (think Gasnier, Fulton, O'Connor, Jamie Lyon). No length of the field tries from that lot above, not really even from Manu, Olam and Crichton; even they are best as 'finishers' and being very sound defensively.
I disagree - these three are all strike centres, esp. Olam & Manu.

By the way, in your list you haven't included Momorowski Momirowski (Roosters) & Graham (Rabbitohs). For the Roosters, Suaalii supposedly has the potential to be a top flight centre, but we don't know if that will happen.

In life, we are sometimes comfortable with something that appears to be doing the job well, and it's after only a change is made that we realize we should have made it earlier 🙂

edited
 
Last edited:

Brookie Bob

"I come back to you now at the turn of the tide"
I disagree - these three are all strike centres, esp. Olam & Manu.

By the way, in your list you haven't included Momorowski (Roosters) & Graham (Rabbitohs). For the Roosters, Suaalii supposedly has the potential to be a top flight centre, but we don't know if that will happen.

In life, we are sometimes comfortable with something that appears to be doing the job well, and it's only a change is made that we realize we should have made it earlier 🙂
You're (of course) free to disagree - all of our collective observations are subjective (mine included), rather than objective.

Apologies for missing off Momrovski, Graham and Suaalii - Momrovski is not amongst the Roosters' players for this year on the NRL website (Players ), Graham is listed as a winger (I did forget that he plays as a centre), with Suaalii listed as a fullback...(possibly exceeding the quotient of doubled-up letters in a name causes me to be forgetful - but I digress. If his name was Sssuuuaaallliiii I'm sure I would forget him altogether).

Still - none of the above names fills me with a sinking feeling of "oh - no - we have to play _________ this weekend, who have ______ playing for them in their centres".

No Steve Renouf's , Mal Meninga's, Steve Rogers, Steve Ella's, Gene Miles, type of players.

Manu I like - he would go well at Manly. Does most things very well. Perhaps my memory isn't that good, but I can't recall Manu cutting a big game open (a la Fulton in the '73 GF, or..(sigh) Inglis in the 2007 GF). Olam - for 93 kgs he runs and tackles hard, but then again he has based his game on Steve Matai. I think Matai had a better step than Olam has, but maybe I'm biased. I still see Olam as fairly one-dimensional; maybe when he bobs up all over the field and can do a chip and chase like O'Connor - maybe I'll change my tune. As he is, I'd love to develop a strategy to stifle him (Olam) out of every game Manly plays, and I think it's very do-able.

All in all, if we've got to call Manu and Olam the games best 'strike' centres we can, if we must; but if we do, then then (IMO) our definition of what is a 'strike centre' has been watered down over the past 10 years or so.
 

40 nil

It's only a game ...
anyone who thinks momorovski is a strike centre hasn't seen him play. He is passive, not great at hit ups, not very fast, ok defender.
I agree. He played in a GF winning team last year - probably due o the emergence of Burton as a centre & Crichton replacing the poorly performing Staines on the wing.

Centre is a position that has diminished in importance in the modern game IMO thats why we we hit rep games we have fullbacks and backrowers covering the position.
True, although Mitchell was an established rep. centre before he became a regular NRL fullback. There there are some exciting young centres coming through - Best, Tabuai-Fidow, Staggs, Lomax, Crichton, Burton (?) and so on.
 
Last edited:

TokyoEagle

Bencher
All in all, if we've got to call Manu and Olam the games best 'strike' centres we can, if we must; but if we do, then then (IMO) our definition of what is a 'strike centre' has been watered down over the past 10 years or so.
Olam is the best in the business IMO and has pulled our pants down on a few occasions these last couple of years.

While the game has changed so that centres are used differently these days, there are not too many grandfinalists from recent memory that don't have at least one very good centre that helps to give them an extra point of attack.
 
Last edited:

maxta

First Grader
Premium Member
Olam is just raw power really, with decent pace.
In other era's where there were O'Conner, Lyons, ,Renouf, Inglis ect he would have just been rated a tough - hard centre.....in fact he just runs "through" players and close to the line especially, has made half comitted defence including Manly's - look ordinary.
Olam is a Solid player who hits hard and usually defensively great like most at Storm, but have seen him have sloppy mits and not always great at getting his winger away....more a solo crashball runner, which is his most effective Trump card.
In the current game, there is only 1 who stands out to me like the dangerous centres who turned games on their own and that would be Staggs in the 3 games a season he plays, or Latrell Mitchell when picked at centre.
I think in general, centres these days the role is different.
Lets go back to 80's and 90's it was all about the sweeping ball movement to get to your strike centre who would use a step, fend, or pure speed to make the break.
Since 2000's the game has shifted far more prominantly to blowing up the ruck/middle and the backline shift works off this momentum to use that 2nd man play (usually involving a fullback) , to put away the winger.....the centre will sometimes be often used as a decoy/option runner, with the key goal to hit the unmarked winger....though the short play to the centre is still often used close to the line with defnce backpeddling or in 2 minds to crash over the try line...
This does not mean it's not a bonus to have a super flashy centre, as Koula showed the other night, gaves another dimension, as early ball he can basically run a line outside his centre and create the defensive winger inwards to provide his winger open spaces.
I just feel the games evolution has seen the "Star centre" almost extinct with the key roles of dummy half and fullback becoming far more important for the reasons above...
To see a Flying Koula in action does still add so much strike and I know 1 thing for sure, opposition will have him in their checklist as a man to watch in the future which will only help Tom and others create mayhem.
 

manly al

First Grader
Olam is just raw power really, with decent pace.
In other era's where there were O'Conner, Lyons, ,Renouf, Inglis ect he would have just been rated a tough - hard centre.....in fact he just runs "through" players and close to the line especially, has made half comitted defence including Manly's - look ordinary.
Olam is a Solid player who hits hard and usually defensively great like most at Storm, but have seen him have sloppy mits and not always great at getting his winger away....more a solo crashball runner, which is his most effective Trump card.
In the current game, there is only 1 who stands out to me like the dangerous centres who turned games on their own and that would be Staggs in the 3 games a season he plays, or Latrell Mitchell when picked at centre.
I think in general, centres these days the role is different.
Lets go back to 80's and 90's it was all about the sweeping ball movement to get to your strike centre who would use a step, fend, or pure speed to make the break.
Since 2000's the game has shifted far more prominantly to blowing up the ruck/middle and the backline shift works off this momentum to use that 2nd man play (usually involving a fullback) , to put away the winger.....the centre will sometimes be often used as a decoy/option runner, with the key goal to hit the unmarked winger....though the short play to the centre is still often used close to the line with defnce backpeddling or in 2 minds to crash over the try line...
This does not mean it's not a bonus to have a super flashy centre, as Koula showed the other night, gaves another dimension, as early ball he can basically run a line outside his centre and create the defensive winger inwards to provide his winger open spaces.
I just feel the games evolution has seen the "Star centre" almost extinct with the key roles of dummy half and fullback becoming far more important for the reasons above...
To see a Flying Koula in action does still add so much strike and I know 1 thing for sure, opposition will have him in their checklist as a man to watch in the future which will only help Tom and others create mayhem.
Good post . Just think the extra appeal of having such a natural athlete like Koula out wider is that , like Turbo can virtually create something out of nothing so to speak through not only speed but a good step as well . Have no doubt that just like the real advantage of having a finisher like Saab with the ability for run away tries , same can apply to koula and looks like he can defend as well . Will be required to take the occasional hit up as well but should be able to acquit . Saab in open space , Koula and Turbo , even Garrick . would rate right up there with some of the better speedy Manly back lines of old .
 

maxta

First Grader
Premium Member
Good post . Just think the extra appeal of having such a natural athlete like Koula out wider is that , like Turbo can virtually create something out of nothing so to speak through not only speed but a good step as well . Have no doubt that just like the real advantage of having a finisher like Saab with the ability for run away tries , same can apply to koula and looks like he can defend as well . Will be required to take the occasional hit up as well but should be able to acquit . Saab in open space , Koula and Turbo , even Garrick . would rate right up there with some of the better speedy Manly back lines of old .
I can't disagree with any of your points here mighty al....in fact we get another chance to see Koula Friday night against Canberra and trial or not - class is class , quality is quality and speed is.....ask Bozo :call:....if he shows enough, I really hope he gets a gig and though not as concerned about the limited abilities of current centres who can get the job done....this bloke can take us to another level and is such an excitement machine, would be a shame to not see him get an opportunity.
 

40 nil

It's only a game ...
Instead of 'strike centre', maybe we can use the term 'attacking weapon'. IMO, we currently have two - Turbo & Saab (one metre clear -> try time). I think Haumole could evolve into one and with Koula as well, the Sea Eagles will be a very exciting team to watch.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
13 10 3 97 24
14 10 4 118 22
14 10 4 78 22
13 8 5 66 20
14 8 6 143 18
13 7 6 81 18
13 7 6 -55 18
14 7 6 42 17
14 7 7 37 16
15 8 7 -8 16
14 7 7 -50 16
14 6 7 13 15
14 6 8 -55 14
13 4 9 -126 12
14 4 10 -121 10
13 3 10 -129 10
13 3 10 -131 10
Back
Top Bottom