One request I have is the language filter. I understand why you put it on as default but could you include an option to allow the naughty words for people that can handle them?
That's why I asked for the option, then we can all get what we prefer.I must admit whilst I use the occasional **** and ****, I quite like that they are blanked out.
You only have to go on the Kennel to see the alternative!
Such a thing comes without freedom though.One request I have is the language filter. I understand why you put it on as default but could you include an option to allow the naughty words for people that can handle them?
Cuzzo?Just a suggestion @Dan ... but you could try Manly's Media Consultant for some advice.
Cuzzo?
Pretty sure it’s his shout next time I’m in Sydney?
He is a good guy, plenty of time for him and we already have a good dialog and repoire
Ok, fair enough.In other words without individually vetting every request it’s not as simple as saying “I’d like to read it all”
I understand what you are saying,I voted yes if that is where you want to take the site.I know what you are wishing to implement,I am just saying that many are resistant to change.The membership numbers I was talking about are the club membership,not for this site by the way.I am happy to be a participant however it goes for the site.....I get the feeling that a lot of people are worried that the site will become less personal for them,but I get that it is not your intention for that to happenI’m really struggling with how my idea is being misconceived.
I need to be clear “a Facebook site” is not the idea.
The idea is in extending the current capabilities, without removing current capabilities
To enhance and personalise the experience for each user more.
Rather than take a hit and miss and random content, which you’ll still be able to do, you’ll have the ability to be presented with more targeted information that you have indicated you have a preference for.
So, say you really like 10 posts of what poster x has said, then on a page that you choose to go to, you will be presented with more content from poster X and related content around them, you can then easily communicate and contribute inline.
If you decide you don’t like their content as much or anymore you can reduce the exposure to that content.
People fear change but I can’t be more clear in saying what I’m proposing will not erase the current experience it will only add another avenue of production and consumption
Ok, fair enough.
Haha. Now that would be funny 🙂Just as long as you don’t delete my stats to zero!!
I’d hate to be a newbie again.
Haha. Now that would be funny 🙂
Haha. Now that would be funny 🙂
It'd be better to change all his likes received to troll ratings!
How many do you have? With the 'Friday Night Footy' theme, none of the rating totals are shown.Now THAT would piss me off!!
About 15,000How many do you have? With the 'Friday Night Footy' theme, none of the rating totals are shown.
About 15,000
14,000 from your alias... "Mr Invisible!" - lol
You've only given out about 4k....maybe you should pull yer finger out!
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 110 | 20 |
2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
3 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
4 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 14 |
5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
6 | Sea Eagles | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 12 |
7 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 12 |
8 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 11 |
9 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 10 |
11 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
12 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 10 |
13 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
14 | Dolphins | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
15 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |
16 | Eels | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -99 | 8 |
17 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 8 |