Masked Eagle
Bencher
Mal Cochrane said:SeaEagleRock8 said:Mal you have shot your own argument in the foot when you say Blues halves were not good enough.Mal Cochrane said:Blues halves are not good enough.
When were the Morris boys or jennings given some ball. The right side defence was a shambles, Gifty a big loss.
Now, this is why unfortunately Slater is a mile ahead of Stewart when their careers finish. Slater can turn a game on his own, does not depend on go forward from his forwards etc....for club footy and rep footy Stewart is still a top manly FB, but rate him against the greats, well, if you put him in a team not playing well he doesn't offer much. Slater can turn the match for his team...seen it many a time, and yes i remember dome stuff ups for Aust from Slater some years ago, but let's be fair dinkum,
Snake is a sensation when playing with decent playmakers, eg 2008 version of Ox and current version of DCE & Foz. So is Slater - who for almost his entire career has had the benefit of running his plays off Cronk and Smith, as well as Locky and Thurston in origin. I agree Slater is better than Snake in some ways, but Snake is better in others.
Shot myself nowhere. In fact you have strengthened my argument. Slater doesn't depend on halves or the team going well as Stewart does.
Masked Eagle said:Mal Cochrane said:Blues halves are not good enough.
When were the Morris boys or jennings given some ball. The right side defence was a shambles, Gifty a big loss.
Now, this is why unfortunately Slater is a mile ahead of Stewart when their careers finish. Slater can turn a game on his own, does not depend on go forward from his forwards etc....for club footy and rep footy Stewart is still a top manly FB, but rate him against the greats, well, if you put him in a team not playing well he doesn't offer much. Slater can turn the match for his team...seen it many a time, and yes i remember dome stuff ups for Aust from Slater some years ago, but let's be fair dinkum,
No doubt Slater can turn a game. World Cup final springs to mind. I'd go as far to say if he played fullback tonight instead of Inglis the Blues would have won.
ok....good on you....as if. Inglis in centres instead of ineffectual Neilson with Slater as FB and Blues would have won. 🙄
NSW dominated field position in games 1 & 2 despite an ordinary kicking game because they bashed Slater on his kick returns and the start of every QLD set was ineffective because of the way the Blues dominated Slater, they were able to get their line set and really punish QLD in the first couple of rucks. GI destroyed the Blues last night, with his returns and by him knocking defenders out of the way and NSW needing to commit more players just tackle him meant we weren't set early in the count making it a hellava lot easier for QLD to gain some momentum early in their sets. That had a huge impact on the way the game was played.