The No-Look News (Schuster Chronicles)

Will be fascinating to see him at 5/8, must admit. My first thought was it will diminish our chances because we can't afford to give up any possession to the Eels, and this is one area Josh needs to improve on.
If he doesn't give up possession, though, he could even end up the match-winner. I won't be there but will definitely catch the telecast.
(After all the media adulation for Sam Walker and now Walsh, just hope he doesn't feel he has to come up with miracle plays all the time. But I think he'll be fine)
Could be very boring to watch if he plays it safe or sticks with his stock standard plays or could be exciting if there is space and time allowing him to run at defenders.

At the moment i see his class but bored with his passing and some of the lines he runs, mind you his passing options have been limited by where and when he gets the ball in our structure and how Manly setup so not entirely his fault that is for sure.
 
It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).

Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.
 
It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).

Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!

just sayin’
 
The no-look dummy. He will be unstoppable.
Touche lol.. you know what I mean - i.e. his ability and skillset has the potential to fool oppositions, the more experience he gains, and the more selective he is with the no-look passing. def adds x-factor

btw i could prob name a few players who would be fooled by a no-look dummy!
 
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.

Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!

just sayin’


I'M ON SMOKO...

SO LEAVE ME ALONE!



@Ranga
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 20 16 0 4 152 36
2 Storm 19 14 0 5 228 34
3 Bulldogs 19 14 0 5 122 34
4 Warriors 19 12 0 7 26 30
5 Panthers 19 11 1 7 83 29
6 Broncos 19 11 0 8 124 28
7 Sharks 20 12 0 8 43 28
8 Dolphins 19 10 0 9 171 26
9 Roosters 19 9 0 10 20 24
10 Sea Eagles 19 9 0 10 6 24
11 Dragons 19 7 0 12 -58 20
12 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 20
13 Cowboys 20 7 1 12 -177 19
14 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 18
15 Eels 19 6 0 13 -153 18
16 Titans 19 5 0 14 -153 16
17 Rabbitohs 20 6 0 14 -197 16
Back
Top Bottom