Trump

[h27272727]

Have a glance at the comment section of that video and say that you’re proud to be in that company with a straight face.

“Of course he doesn’t want peace, war is too lucrative !”

“if this is true, Zelensky is over. Just share information, and we won”

“Zelenkyys will reject the peace deal. He is making too much money.”

He will reject the peace deal - but because Trump is stupid enough to think Putin won’t just continue the invasion in a few years like last time… you don’t reward dictators otherwise you validate their violence and make future escalation inevitable. Two recent studies: Israel 1940s to current. Ukraine 2010s,

I haven’t given this a proper look yet. First impressions are that this is from some random Turkish article. Why the blue hell do people like you distrust science with all your will (referring to the other recent post) yet buckle to the stupidest sources of information. In the recent post, you admitted that you felt you know better than decades of scientists. I.e critical thinking people = wrong. random Turkish paper or Trump-issued climate report = every word is a biblical fact. While this is bizarre on paper, it’s fairly obvious why you discount anything comprehensive in favour of those conspirational; you want to believe what you want to believe - no need to ground yourself in reality when you can submit to the twitter/youtube/Facebook algorithm feeding you misinformation, leaning into your fears, building blind hatred and encouraging shameless confidence even when discussing topics where you display fundamental misunderstandings (eg. Tariffs)

Look I refuse to call you stupid. Many people evolve with time and a lot of people that get caught up in far-right / far-left think tanks end up breaking free at some point. You have strong passion / loyalty, so there’s some positives to work with. Other thing is that you’re a manly fan and are over Seibold. Perhaps have a short break off twitter/facebook or whatever and watch some documentaries, read some books, etc. if you have a particular interest in a topic (eg. Climate change, tariffs, whatever) then read the accepted science or available statistics (from however many sources), contrast it with your sources and make more informed decisions. Ignoring the susbtance without offering serious, testable theories won't stop legitimate scientists from rolling on ahead elsewhere in the world. Trump's 'proud boys' US can fall behind if they so choose to, but once the dust settles and the authoritarian-fanboys are thrown to the curb (again) they'll be catipulted back to reality

 

[Brookie1973]

While that’s an exaggeration, the answer is yes they most definitely have done so (i.e addressing predictions from notable early papers on aspects such as water levels, natural disaster frequency, etc. Go to google scholar and you can search for papers addressing older theories; note this also includes cases where studies have since been validated

Here you go. Just a quick list of climate Armageddon scenarios that have not come to pass. There are plenty more - I will let you google at your leisure.

Perhaps it is this type of climate alarmism which is driving the massive and potentially harmful overreaction that is the central premise of the Dept of Energy report? And by the way, one of the reports authors worked for Obama.

33 Climate Predictions That Never Happened (A History of Inaccuracy) - Survival World

For decades, the public has been bombarded with bold climate predictions - many of which claimed to offer definitive timelines for disaster. From disappearing

www.survivalworld.com

 

[Brookie1973]

Have a glance at the comment section of that video and say that you’re proud to be in that company with a straight face.

“Of course he doesn’t want peace, war is too lucrative !”

“if this is true, Zelensky is over. Just share information, and we won”

“Zelenkyys will reject the peace deal. He is making too much money.”

He will reject the peace deal - but because Trump is stupid enough to think Putin won’t just continue the invasion in a few years like last time… you don’t reward dictators otherwise you validate their violence and make future escalation inevitable. Two recent studies: Israel 1940s to current. Ukraine 2010s,

I haven’t given this a proper look yet. First impressions are that this is from some random Turkish article. Why the blue hell do people like you distrust science with all your will (referring to the other recent post) yet buckle to the stupidest sources of information. In the recent post, you admitted that you felt you know better than decades of scientists. I.e critical thinking people = wrong. random Turkish paper or Trump-issued climate report = every word is a biblical fact. While this is bizarre on paper, it’s fairly obvious why you discount anything comprehensive in favour of those conspirational; you want to believe what you want to believe - no need to ground yourself in reality when you can submit to the twitter/youtube/Facebook algorithm feeding you misinformation, leaning into your fears, building blind hatred and encouraging shameless confidence even when discussing topics where you display fundamental misunderstandings (eg. Tariffs)

Look I refuse to call you stupid. Many people evolve with time and a lot of people that get caught up in far-right / far-left think tanks end up breaking free at some point. You have strong passion / loyalty, so there’s some positives to work with. Other thing is that you’re a manly fan and are over Seibold. Perhaps have a short break off twitter/facebook or whatever and watch some documentaries, read some books, etc. if you have a particular interest in a topic (eg. Climate change, tariffs, whatever) then read the accepted science or available statistics (from however many sources), contrast it with your sources and make more informed decisions. Ignoring the susbtance without offering serious, testable theories won't stop legitimate scientists from rolling on ahead elsewhere in the world. Trump's 'proud boys' US can fall behind if they so choose to, but once the dust settles and the authoritarian-fanboys are thrown to the curb (again) they'll be catipulted back to reality

I was wondering how long it would take before you reverted to the leftist default setting of perceived moral and intellectual superiority laced with generous helpings of patronising condescension. I give you points for resisting the urge this long.