manlyfan76
Them / They
One of trumps puppet masters.
Well, must admit H27 it's good seeing some self reflection from one of our opponents of the left. I don't usually read all of your posts in it's entirety, I'll speed read every paragraph, I usually get the point you are making fairly quickly tho. Brookie usually gets a reaction from you, maybe you and him have a lot in common except politicaly of course. Not to much to add really, you obviously need more words than most to get your points across. No one really answers questions in bad faith it all comes down to what you believe in.Thanks for actually taking the time to clarify what you meant. It does help me gain some perspective even though in this particular instance the extra information didn't necessarily bring me closer to your position. A
ll good if you don't want to answer, but I do have two followup questions for now.
1. Are you genuinely interested/curious as to why I used those descriptors with respect to Levett?
No worries if the interest isn't there -- just trying to gauge whether there's a will to delve deeper into this Levett topic or not.Now for this next part I want you to be totally honest in your assessment of me (nothing is off limits - I won't judge or try convince you against your answer):
2. How do you feel about the nature of my prodding questions, or even just me in general?
For example: Do you often feel I only ask questions in bad faith? Do you feel they are pedantic or worthwhile? Some examples of my 'prodding questions': 'could you clarify ', 'what did you mean by __', 'list particular examples of what __ refers to', etc.
I know you were referring to left-aligned press when raising 'gotcha questions'. It just made me wonder how exactly the pro-Trump/pro-MAGA folk perceive me on here and perhaps why.
Don't have to of course; also the floor is open for anyone to jump in
@Eagle 1A pushover, as to get her ratled and lose her train of thought. And all credit to her, this has never happened. Of course, Trump is going to have a PS who isn't going to be meek and mild, it's a pool of Liberal sharks in the briefing room, any sign of weakness and you'll be torn apart. You've put a lot of labels on her, most don't make sense, deceptive isn't one of them. She answers every loaded question to the begrudging Liberal press eagerly waiting there turn to try and trip her up, but never do. Leavitts a natural, she's prepared and briefed and more than ready to bat away those tiresome gotcha questions with a scortching reply and a steely stare.
Yes, hope you liked it SER8.@Eagle 1
Did you write this post?
The lefts own Bill Maher telling it like it is. Absolutely spot on.
I dont necessarily agree with what she said however we should add the context of what she said as well ,rather than just the sensationalist highlight.
Leavitt's statement was made in the context of criticizing NYC candidate Mamdani's refusal to condemn Hamas during his Fox interview, but she expanded it into a sweeping characterization of the entire Democratic Party's base. The comments drew immediate and widespread condemnation from Democrats and some journalists as inflammatory, divisive, and potentially dangerous rhetoric from an official White House spokesperson. Critics argued it was inappropriate for a government official to characterize roughly half the American electorate in such terms.
Mamdani is a divisive socialist wierdo himself, having in the past called for Police defunding,refusal to condemn the term globalise the intifada ,all sorts of socialist interventions into various areas like Grocery shops, rental freezes, creating various LGBTQI authorities and departments ,legal representation for every illegal immigrant etc etc you get the picture .
Anyways Leavitt is a ferocious and capable prosecutor for her cause and as someone said she doesn't miss ,although maybe went a little hard on this one
Well, must admit H27 it's good seeing some self reflection from one of our opponents of the left. I don't usually read all of your posts in it's entirety, I'll speed read every paragraph, I usually get the point you are making fairly quickly tho. Brookie usually gets a reaction from you, maybe you and him have a lot in common except politicaly of course. Not to much to add really, you obviously need more words than most to get your points across. No one really answers questions in bad faith it all comes down to what you believe in.
This is interesting to me and worthwhile to hear. Internally I tend to critique my posts for the opposite reason; i.e. they each tend to address too many separate or adjacent ideas. Nonetheless, your view is valid. It still indicates to me that my posting style is ineffective, watering down ideas and/or making them incoherent. I have considered addressing separate points in separate posts, although I am conscious that we shift to new topics on a daily basis.you obviously need more words than most to get your points across.
Woodsie your going to send a few over the edge with this sort of stuff ,,good work![]()
How do you feel about the No Kings protest?Woodsie your going to send a few over the edge with this sort of stuff ,,good work
Not really,it is pretty much a dime a dozen out there.Sort of more like Old man shakes fist at clouds stuff.Woodsie your going to send a few over the edge with this sort of stuff ,,good work
As opposed to what? A young person screaming "from the river to the sea" without knowing which river or what sea they are yelling about? Never mind, when albo was asked the same question he couldn't answer it either. I will gladly support the old man shaking his fist at the sky in this instance.Not really,it is pretty much a dime a dozen out there.Sort of more like Old man shakes fist at clouds stuff.
I guess we are through the lifting the state of political discourse.Woodsie your going to send a few over the edge with this sort of stuff ,,good work
As opposed to what? A young person screaming "from the river to the sea" without knowing which river or what sea they are yelling about? Never mind, when albo was asked the same question he couldn't answer it either. I will gladly support the old man shaking his fist at the sky in this instance.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
24 | 19 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
![]() |
24 | 17 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
![]() |
24 | 16 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
![]() |
24 | 15 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
![]() |
24 | 15 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
![]() |
24 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
![]() |
24 | 13 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
![]() |
24 | 13 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
![]() |
24 | 12 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
![]() |
24 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
![]() |
24 | 10 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
![]() |
24 | 9 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
![]() |
24 | 8 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
![]() |
24 | 6 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
![]() |
24 | 6 | 18 | -300 | 18 |