Because that would be deemed an unfair contract term. Hence, unenforceable as it ignores the premise of contract law.
The issue is Parramatta management, they offered, Will accepted. If parra seek to withdraw that contract, he is more than entitled to seek remedy for difference.
Performance (in reference to your cheerleading comment) is irrelevant and would only come into play if there was a verbal agreement as it constitutes an agreement crystallized through performance i.e. Will taking the field.
It is not opportunistic as you note, it is law.
We'll agree to disagree re the opportunism part & I'm not sure you're correct re the second part.
I would have thought clauses to protect either party are common place.
E.g. injuries, payout conditions, ill discipline, Foran has some supposed get out clause if Arthur is not coach.
Not sure how in the eyes of the "law" you could prove a contract being subject to NRL approval & registration would be unlawful ? In principle.
After all the contract is for a guy to represent the club to play NRL, not to represent the cheerleading squad.
@Eelectric - Hoppa would be disappointed that the very lucrative contract he signed was not honoured. And he may have lost out significantly because other clubs moved on when he signed with Parra. Without certainty contracts lose their meaning. And the whole system can quickly fall down. The problem is not with Hoppa. It is with Parra signing, then reneging. That's how I see it at least. This reneging seems to be habitual at Parra. Foz went through the same thing.
The nrl would have approved the contract, on the proviso that parra moved a player or two on to balance the cap. Happens all the time at all clubs.
What happened here is that parra changed its mind after will signed. The only question for the court to decide is "how much".
The nrl would have approved the contract, on the proviso that parra moved a player or two on to balance the cap. Happens all the time at all clubs.
What happened here is that parra changed its mind after will signed. The only question for the court to decide is "how much".
Ggggrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!
I cannot wait for the season to start so that a thread about a Canterbury player's problem with Parramatta isn't constantly at the top of our Silvertails threads.
And yes, I see what I've done here.
Doh!
I feel like the NRL is doing everything in its power NOT to take points from the Eels and the Eels keep pushing them further and further.It affects us.
Hoppa, who sue's Parra and wins his case, then has his cap money used up for their team, meaning starting on minus 4 points is a "dream" compared to what MAY happen (with shedding players, and more points). Kieran Foran the mercenary, who left Manly with his missus claiming karma receives HIS, leaving all Manly fans warm and fuzzy inside 😉
On an unrelated note, @Eelectric i have enjoyed your commentary on here.
Good to see some parra fans have intelligencekeep up the good work.
It's like that someone who keeps finding reasons not to leave their cheating partner.I feel like the NRL is doing everything in its power NOT to take points from the Eels and the Eels keep pushing them further and further.
Seeing as you have behaved yourself we have upgraded your avatar from muppet status. You are now a "Ray Higgs", Parra import who was decidedly underwhelming despite the hype.Right back at you @mjb136 . I've enjoyed the banter here , the good humour & intelligence here.
I feel like the NRL is doing everything in its power NOT to take points from the Eels and the Eels keep pushing them further and further.
Seeing as you have behaved yourself we have upgraded your avatar from muppet status. You are now a "Ray Higgs", Parra import who was decidedly underwhelming despite the hype.
This isn't some touchy feely commune mate. The only people with rights here are Manly supporters, everyone else has responsibilities, not rights. So your responsibility is to behave and not let your expectations get confused with your limitations. If you continue to be humble, obedient and respectful of the superior Manly supporters then you may get a further avatar upgrade.@Chip and Chase , I'd like to thank you both. Was a big fan of Phil Blake, btw.
Still, there are some concerns re the democratic process here & constitutional measures protecting rights to free choice of avatar. There's probably a sound reason most modern civilised cultures have moved towards democracy & respect of individual rights.
How about this one ? More neutral.View attachment 3107
@Chip and Chase , I'd like to thank you both. Was a big fan of Phil Blake, btw.
Still, there are some concerns re the democratic process here & constitutional measures protecting rights to free choice of avatar. There's probably a sound reason most modern civilised cultures have moved towards democracy & respect of individual rights.
How about this one ? More neutral.View attachment 3107
1. Big fan of Phil Blake.@Chip and Chase , I'd like to thank you both. Was a big fan of Phil Blake, btw.
Still, there are some concerns re the democratic process here & constitutional measures protecting rights to free choice of avatar. There's probably a sound reason most modern civilised cultures have moved towards democracy & respect of individual rights.
How about this one ? More neutral.View attachment 3107
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
3 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
4 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |