Brissie Kid said:Stevo said:This is a stupid arguement. Why should he go under the cap if he doesn't play? So what if he puts their jersey on?
Hoppa does have a contract in place now to play for the Eels. He is now appearing in Eels jersey.
It's no different to paying a player peanuts and then paying him a truckload after retiring. The NRL wouldn't let that pass. They would put all the money under the club's cap.
Stevo said:If Paul Vautin is being payed to spruik our brand, should it come under our salary cap?
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 26 |
2 | Raiders | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 24 |
3 | Warriors | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 24 |
4 | Storm | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 171 | 22 |
5 | Sharks | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 18 |
6 | Dolphins | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 146 | 16 |
7 | Broncos | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 16 |
8 | Roosters | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | -18 | 16 |
9 | Panthers | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -9 | 15 |
10 | Cowboys | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -106 | 15 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 14 |
12 | Dragons | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -59 | 14 |
13 | Tigers | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -62 | 14 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -88 | 14 |
15 | Knights | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | -69 | 12 |
16 | Eels | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -105 | 12 |
17 | Titans | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -122 | 12 |