Burgess' squirrel tackle

Rambo1987 said:
Just heard they are saying it was a wedgie - Your kidding me a wedgie.

That's the same excuse that Hoppa used and look where that got him. 🙄
 
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.
 
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

I am disappointed in you Mick surely you haven't forgotten about another Pommy player in my beloved Dogs that could be included in your illustrious list of players🙂
 
Guzzler said:
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

I am disappointed in you Mick surely you haven't forgotten about another Pommy player in my beloved Dogs that could be included in your illustrious list of players🙂

Yeah I thought about him but he did bite Slater so it kind of cancels the dislike out LOL
 
pleaded guilty, would've been nuts to contest it.

Judicary would've have had to bring out the injured Storm Scum player to show his blue b...s as evidence
 
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

The ONLY thing Slater has going for him is when he protected and held the Wolfman up when he broke he neck at Brookie that time. Apart from that, total peasant on the field.
 
1150878_543919955661469_1945942482_n.jpg
 
Brissie Kid said:
There's no video that shows what if anything he did. I'm not saying he didn't do what he has been charged with but it is all circumstantial evidence. But maybe for the NRL system that is enough but I would appeal it. Low act if he did go the squirrel grip though.

I don't think Chambers was rolling around on the ground in agony, holding 'himself' with pain written all over his face, for nothing! It left little doubt to me and yes it was a 'low' act by Burgess...scum.
 
CAMBO said:
Can someone explain how squeezing a players testicles is different to poking a players anus with your fingers.
Yet precedence says poking an anus of an opposition player is worthy of a penalty 6 times more severe than squeezing a players testicles. (12 weeks for hoppa in 2001)
How does that work? In public both would be treated as indecent assault?
Not true. Uninvited penetration is sexual assault and considered far more serious.
 
[attachment=579]
 

Attachments

  • satisfaction-squirrel-nuts-demotivational-poster-1229918653.jpg
    satisfaction-squirrel-nuts-demotivational-poster-1229918653.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 24

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom