Burgess' squirrel tackle

Rambo1987 said:
Just heard they are saying it was a wedgie - Your kidding me a wedgie.

That's the same excuse that Hoppa used and look where that got him. 🙄
 
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.
 
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

I am disappointed in you Mick surely you haven't forgotten about another Pommy player in my beloved Dogs that could be included in your illustrious list of players🙂
 
Guzzler said:
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

I am disappointed in you Mick surely you haven't forgotten about another Pommy player in my beloved Dogs that could be included in your illustrious list of players🙂

Yeah I thought about him but he did bite Slater so it kind of cancels the dislike out LOL
 
pleaded guilty, would've been nuts to contest it.

Judicary would've have had to bring out the injured Storm Scum player to show his blue b...s as evidence
 
mickqld said:
GUILTY - scummy pommy dog act. Now sitting on the same rung as Smith,Slater,Ennis,Reynolds.

The ONLY thing Slater has going for him is when he protected and held the Wolfman up when he broke he neck at Brookie that time. Apart from that, total peasant on the field.
 
1150878_543919955661469_1945942482_n.jpg
 
Brissie Kid said:
There's no video that shows what if anything he did. I'm not saying he didn't do what he has been charged with but it is all circumstantial evidence. But maybe for the NRL system that is enough but I would appeal it. Low act if he did go the squirrel grip though.

I don't think Chambers was rolling around on the ground in agony, holding 'himself' with pain written all over his face, for nothing! It left little doubt to me and yes it was a 'low' act by Burgess...scum.
 
CAMBO said:
Can someone explain how squeezing a players testicles is different to poking a players anus with your fingers.
Yet precedence says poking an anus of an opposition player is worthy of a penalty 6 times more severe than squeezing a players testicles. (12 weeks for hoppa in 2001)
How does that work? In public both would be treated as indecent assault?
Not true. Uninvited penetration is sexual assault and considered far more serious.
 
[attachment=579]
 

Attachments

  • satisfaction-squirrel-nuts-demotivational-poster-1229918653.jpg
    satisfaction-squirrel-nuts-demotivational-poster-1229918653.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 23

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 20 16 0 4 152 36
2 Storm 19 14 0 5 228 34
3 Bulldogs 19 14 0 5 122 34
4 Warriors 19 12 0 7 26 30
5 Panthers 19 11 1 7 83 29
6 Broncos 19 11 0 8 124 28
7 Sharks 20 12 0 8 43 28
8 Dolphins 19 10 0 9 171 26
9 Roosters 19 9 0 10 20 24
10 Sea Eagles 19 9 0 10 6 24
11 Dragons 19 7 0 12 -58 20
12 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 20
13 Cowboys 20 7 1 12 -177 19
14 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 18
15 Eels 19 6 0 13 -153 18
16 Titans 19 5 0 14 -153 16
17 Rabbitohs 20 6 0 14 -197 16
Back
Top Bottom