General NRL chat

[Brookie1973]

It’s not “sloppy reporting” to say he was driving with “a cocktail of drugs in his system”, it’s what the magistrate said at his sentencing.

Liam knight didn’t injure 3 people including a 4 year old girl. Liam knighted didn’t have a shocking driving record prior to his conviction.

Liam knights conviction didn’t prompt a State Attorney General to publicly question its leniency.

NRL star’s driving ‘disgrace’ exposed as new details surface

The 21-year-old’s full list of traffic penalties and punishments have been laid bare for all to see.

7news.com.au

 

[SeaEagleRock8]

It was sloppy of the magistrate to use that phrase for the same reason I explained.

Anyhow as I said above I've no interest in defending Mam's history of driving infringements or the accident.

And would I prefer to get hit head on by an unlicenced driver, or not hit at all by a drunk driver? Option B please.

But you're missing the point i was making so don't worry about it.

 

[Brookie1973]

It was sloppy of the magistrate to use that phrase for the same reason I explained.

Anyhow as I said above I've no interest in defending Mam's history of driving infringements or the accident.

And would I prefer to get hit head on by an unlicenced driver, or not hit at all by a drunk driver? Option B please.

But you're missing the point i was making so don't worry about it.

Yes, I admit I am unclear what it is you are trying to say.
With regards to the Mam case, I am happy to side with the presiding magistrate and the QLD Attorney General.

 

[Eagledare2dream]

Good point everyone that's how it should b friends again, concentrate on the next game. STRONGER TOGETHER, UP UP DA EAGLES

 

[SeaEagleRock8]

Yes, I admit I am unclear what it is you are trying to say.

Sorry but I don't believe you. You are clearly literate and have a brain, and anyone with those characteristics can discern from my post this simple point:

Sloppy reporting has continually described Mam as guilty of driving under the influence of drugs, but that's not true. Nevertheless as a result many league fans seem to believe it.

 

[Brookie1973]

Sorry but I don't believe you. You are clearly literate and have a brain, and anyone with those characteristics can discern from my post this simple point:

Sloppy reporting has continually described Mam as guilty of driving under the influence of drugs, but that's not true. Nevertheless as a result many league fans seem to believe it.

Ok, I get it know. It’s sloppy reporting to quote the presiding magistrate. Apologies for my confusion.

 

[SeaEagleRock8]

At the risk of labouring the point – here’s the NSW equivalent laws with penalties for first offence

Mam offence
Driving with illicit drug in your blood/saliva/urine (Road Transport Act s111)
Maximum penalty – a fine, plus disqualification from driving for at least 3 months


Renouf offence - Driving under the influence or alcohol or drugs (Road Transport Act s112)
Maximum penalty - 18 months imprisonment, plus disqualification from driving for at least 12 months



(Driving under the influence obviously far more serious)

 

[SeaEagleRock8]

Ok, I get it know. It’s sloppy reporting to quote the presiding magistrate. Apologies for my confusion

Your dishonesty knows no bounds!! It's really outstanding!
I didn't say it was sloppy of you to quote the magistrate, I said it was sloppy of the magistrate to use those words which muddy the facts of what Mam was being sentenced for.

 

[Brookie1973]

Your dishonesty knows no bounds!! It's really outstanding!
I didn't say it was sloppy of you to quote the magistrate, I said it was sloppy of the magistrate to use those words which muddy the facts of what Mam was being sentenced for.

And I said I’d prefer to side with the presiding magistrate on this one.