Loobs said:Apparently (well according the lurker at sportal), Luke Lewis is available. With Tetevano and Hoppa III off the books, is he worth a one year speccie for bench depth?
We do have a great record getting ex Penny vet back rowers...
Disco said:Speccie for bench depth???? Ahh no, he'd be an expensive starter
Cliffy said:Lewis, what to free up space for the sharks to offer more to DCE, Hmmmmmm, Nope.
mozgrame said:5 years ago, I would have jumped at the chance to sign him. 5 years is a long time in the NRL though.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 20 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 152 | 36 |
2 | Storm | 19 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 228 | 34 |
3 | Bulldogs | 18 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 136 | 34 |
4 | Warriors | 19 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 30 |
5 | Panthers | 19 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 83 | 29 |
6 | Broncos | 19 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 124 | 28 |
7 | Dolphins | 19 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 171 | 26 |
8 | Sharks | 19 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 26 |
9 | Roosters | 19 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 24 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 19 | 9 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 24 |
11 | Dragons | 19 | 7 | 0 | 12 | -58 | 20 |
12 | Cowboys | 19 | 7 | 1 | 11 | -157 | 19 |
13 | Knights | 19 | 6 | 0 | 13 | -116 | 18 |
14 | Tigers | 19 | 7 | 0 | 12 | -135 | 18 |
15 | Eels | 19 | 6 | 0 | 13 | -153 | 18 |
16 | Titans | 19 | 5 | 0 | 14 | -153 | 16 |
17 | Rabbitohs | 20 | 6 | 0 | 14 | -197 | 16 |