Loobs said:Apparently (well according the lurker at sportal), Luke Lewis is available. With Tetevano and Hoppa III off the books, is he worth a one year speccie for bench depth?
We do have a great record getting ex Penny vet back rowers...
Disco said:Speccie for bench depth???? Ahh no, he'd be an expensive starter
Cliffy said:Lewis, what to free up space for the sharks to offer more to DCE, Hmmmmmm, Nope.
mozgrame said:5 years ago, I would have jumped at the chance to sign him. 5 years is a long time in the NRL though.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 26 |
2 | Raiders | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 24 |
3 | Warriors | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 24 |
4 | Storm | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 171 | 22 |
5 | Sharks | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 18 |
6 | Dolphins | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 146 | 16 |
7 | Broncos | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 16 |
8 | Roosters | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | -18 | 16 |
9 | Panthers | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -9 | 15 |
10 | Cowboys | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -106 | 15 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 14 |
12 | Dragons | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -59 | 14 |
13 | Tigers | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -62 | 14 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -88 | 14 |
15 | Knights | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | -69 | 12 |
16 | Eels | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -105 | 12 |
17 | Titans | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -122 | 12 |