Andrew Webster article

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
Status
Not open for further replies.
CAMBO said:
SeaEagleRock8 said:
Despite what I just said to Stevo*, this thread covers some very personal and sensitive areas and I feel it's worth acknowledging that in the main it's been conducted in reasonably good spirit, from what I've seen anyway. (Well, at least in better spirit than what I feared it would be, based on some previous ST debating debacles.)

So, many different opinions but credit where it's due.





* (which I should qualify by saying I think his comment was ignorant, not stevo himself who might in other respects be the opposite of ignorant for all I know)
I agree. I'm sure this same debate wouldn't be conducted this way among other fanbases.
I have to admit. Kiwi eagle disappoints me I expected a ladyboi slur directed my way.

He must be mellowing.

Probably has his mouth full. Ever seen the size of a ram's balls?
 
Not much time on here these days chaps

Napper is an expert in this area though, he got a bit vigorous with the ram and ended up eating through a straw for 8 weeks, the impact of balls on chin left a scene reminiscent of Snowden v Thompson up in townsville
 
SeaEagleRock8 said:
Despite what I just said to Stevo*, this thread covers some very personal and sensitive areas and I feel it's worth acknowledging that in the main it's been conducted in reasonably good spirit, from what I've seen anyway. (Well, at least in better spirit than what I feared it would be, based on some previous ST debating debacles.)

So, many different opinions but credit where it's due.





* (which I should qualify by saying I think his comment was ignorant, not stevo himself who might in other respects be the opposite of ignorant for all I know)

I must say and correct me if I'm wrong, the term 'abbo' doesn't come across as overly racist to me.

It's a shorter version of their race. Like, Aussie for Australian, Lebo for a Lebanese man etc...

Much different to calling, for example, a Mexican a 'Wetback' or calling a Chinaman a 'Gook'

It's also in which way you use it. If someone is describing me and says "Adam the Aussie fella" it's ok. But "Hassan the dirty Leb" or "Adam that thong wearing Aussie c***" is also unsavory.
 
Kiwi Eagle said:
Not much time on here these days chaps

Napper is an expert in this area though, he got a bit vigorous with the ram and ended up eating through a straw for 8 weeks, the impact of balls on chin left a scene reminiscent of Snowden v Thompson up in townsville

Have you seen the size of my chin? I could deepthroat the terminator and his steel balls wouldn't even leave a mark


CAMBO said:
I'm sorry but I have to ask what is a wetback. I've never heard that before?

It's a very derogatory term for Mexicans, used in the U.S.A. I'm unfamiliar with it's origins.
 
CAMBO said:
I'm sorry but I have to ask what is a wetback. I've never heard that before?

A metal sleeve that fits in slow combustion heaters etc so as to heat water and return it thermosyphonically to a water storage container.
 
Jatz Crackers said:
CAMBO said:
I'm sorry but I have to ask what is a wetback. I've never heard that before?

A metal sleeve that fits in slow combustion heaters etc so as to heat water and return it thermosyphonically to a water storage container.

I googled the real meaning. Replace metal sleeve with 'Mexican' and water storage container with 'swamp on mexican border'
 
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation


As i have stated no problem with sex education for the above scenarios you mentioned -----but celebrating or promoting a lifestyle(Gay/Lesbian Straight, Swingers etc) on the other hand is in most part not about educating.

I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational as it shows the mechanics in clear detail better than any book. It is the context and way such information is delivered that makes the difference.

No little TC's Thank God--- i would be overly technical in every aspect of their lives and we really don't need another set of TC's clogging up Dans servers with technical dribble from a more youthful perspective.
 
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation




I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational as it shows the mechanics in clear detail better than any book.

.

Come on, you're kidding aren't you?
 
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation


As i have stated no problem with sex education for the above scenarios you mentioned -----but celebrating or promoting a lifestyle(Gay/Lesbian Straight, Swingers etc) on the other hand is in most part not about educating.

I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational

You might be able to. I couldn't.
You really have no idea. It's not a celebration of the sexual acts. It's a celebration of the acceptance of gay people. It's about gays being proud rather than ashamed of something that was not a choice.
 
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation




No little TC's Thank god.

Technically, you're not thanking anyone...
 
Napper said:
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation




I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational as it shows the mechanics in clear detail better than any book.

Hahahahahahaha.

Come on, you're kidding aren't you?

Hell no i am dead serious "rolls eyes"


bones said:
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation


As i have stated no problem with sex education for the above scenarios you mentioned -----but celebrating or promoting a lifestyle(Gay/Lesbian Straight, Swingers etc) on the other hand is in most part not about educating.

I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational

You might be able to. I couldn't.
You really have no idea. It's not a celebration of the sexual acts. It's a celebration of the acceptance of gay people. It's about gays being proud rather than ashamed of something that was not a choice.

Did i state "i could argue" at any point?

It was a celebration of acceptance and being open minded, it no longer is.
 
Technical Coach said:
Napper said:
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation




I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational as it shows the mechanics in clear detail better than any book.

Hahahahahahaha.

Come on, you're kidding aren't you?

Hell no i am dead serious "rolls eyes"


bones said:
Technical Coach said:
lsz said:
Tc not sure if there are any little tc's running around but any parent will tell you that , as much as we do not like it, kids are getting forms of sex info much earlier

A friend of mine had to have the "talk" with his 9 year old daughter

Why? As someone had told her she could get pregnant by holding hands with a boy . Another had to have the chat with their 10 year old son

Personally I would rather my son is educated about sex, correctly, when he starts to ask questions rather than misinformation


As i have stated no problem with sex education for the above scenarios you mentioned -----but celebrating or promoting a lifestyle(Gay/Lesbian Straight, Swingers etc) on the other hand is in most part not about educating.

I mean you could argue children viewing porn is educational

You might be able to. I couldn't.
You really have no idea. It's not a celebration of the sexual acts. It's a celebration of the acceptance of gay people. It's about gays being proud rather than ashamed of something that was not a choice.

Did i state "i could argue" at any point?

It was a celebration of acceptance and being open minded, it no longer is.



Who cares what it no longer is? Rugby league started out as a way for amateur Rugby Union players to get paid for playing. It no longer serves that purpose. Should we scrap the NRL?
 
Lol. What a thread. Certainly learnt more about my fellow silvertails in this thread than I have in 5+ years of reading dribble about rugby league.
 
Napper said:
SeaEagleRock8 said:
Despite what I just said to Stevo*, this thread covers some very personal and sensitive areas and I feel it's worth acknowledging that in the main it's been conducted in reasonably good spirit, from what I've seen anyway. (Well, at least in better spirit than what I feared it would be, based on some previous ST debating debacles.)

So, many different opinions but credit where it's due.


* (which I should qualify by saying I think his comment was ignorant, not stevo himself who might in other respects be the opposite of ignorant for all I know)

I must say and correct me if I'm wrong, the term 'abbo' doesn't come across as overly racist to me.

It's a shorter version of their race. Like, Aussie for Australian, Lebo for a Lebanese man etc...

Much different to calling, for example, a Mexican a 'Wetback' or calling a Chinaman a 'Gook'

It's also in which way you use it. If someone is describing me and says "Adam the Aussie fella" it's ok. But "Hassan the dirty Leb" or "Adam that thong wearing Aussie c***" is also unsavory.

I could never understand that - "abbo". Where did the extra "b" come from? Shouldn't it be "A-bo"?

I would call a Mexican "Sir". If you've seen the things they get up to, it would make the most hardened Aussie criminals weak at the knees.

"Gooks", now that's an interesting one. Koreans call their people and nation, "Han-Gook". When the Yanks fought in Korea, suddenly every non whitey in East Asia is a "Gook" (Korean). That includes, Chinaman, Vietnamese, etc.

How many of us know what "Asia" comprises of? How about most of Turkey, Israel, most of Russia, Saudi, India, Persia, Indonesia, all the way to Nippon land? Funny who we call Asian, as they don't exactly all look alike! We can blame our News media as they are very much illiterate.

"Adam that thong wearing Aussie??" Well, I think a lot of it is "Josh" now isn't it? How many know Josh (Joshua) is the Greek pronunciation of the Aramaic "Yeshua", ie. Jesus? Either that or Jack, James or Cooper!
 
After all it's wise to agree - each to their own.
Each is entitled to their opinion and you can choose if you agree or like it.

I do not judge anyone because I'm far from been a good Christian. But what I do know about god is that he does not like murder , hatred , stealing , violence etc but encourages good , respect , love for one another , peace.

We live in a world today that we must have proof to believe in something , and that is a fair and understanding way to feel.

But a Christian prefers to have faith over proof and shouldn't get shot down because of their decision.

Religion doesn't start wars , man does with their power trips & egos , they use religion as an excuse.
that's my view on the issue.

I also like to add this regarding the gay issue and I don't mean to offend.

Let's say that if every male today was put on one side of the world and every female on the other with no access to each other even say that we didn't know the other side existed whether each person was gay or straight how long would you say Human life would last for 80/90 years ??? I would say there would be something wrong with the human race if that was the case considering that society has constantly continued to breed our human race for hundreds of years even before Jesus when traditionally a man & woman get together. Therefore when I hear the word marriage and family I think of man & woman.

Sorry if I've offended anyone.
 
panash said:
Let's say that if every male today was put on one side of the world and every female on the other with no access to each other even say that we didn't know the other side existed whether each person was gay or straight how long would you say Human life would last for 80/90 years ???

Or how about if everyone stayed where they are now and less than 10% of the population were homosexual... Imagaine that. How on earth would human life continue ?
 
Isn't it? That's where i learned all my moves!


SeaEagleRock8 said:
Stevo said:
SeaEagleRock8 said:
Stevo said:
SeaEagleRock8 said:
Sorry Darren and Panash, it's ridiculously simplistic to say everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Speaking about homosexuality in the same breath as Satan is about as close to openly advocating gay-bashing as it gets.

Did you apply the same logic to Andrew Johns's right to call Greg Inglis a black c***?

You've got your Abbo's mixed up mate
Congratulations.
You have managed to come up with the most offensive and ignorant post in this thread. And somehow you achieved all this without even referring to sexuality or religion.

How am i ignorant? You're the one who can't tell two black fellas apart.
How indeed? Let me count the ways.

- You are ignorant for using the term 'Abo'. If you think that's inoffensive I suggest you google it before you inadvertently offend more people.

- You are ignorant because it was Inglis that Johns was speaking about. Tahu heard it because he was in the Blues camp. Tahu left in protest at how another Aboriginal was being denigrated.

- You are ignorant because you can't spell.

You didn't count the ways. You listed them. Ironstine.

- The Abo's at the Aboriginal mission in the town i live in and have played footy with all my life call themselves Abo's and black fellas and they are way more deadly than you so i don't see how it's racist for me to shorten Aborigine to Abo.

- Yeah you're right sorry. In my defense they all look the same to me.

- Mistype. I have fat fingers and i was using my phone. Do you have an issue with fat people too?
 
bones said:
panash said:
Let's say that if every male today was put on one side of the world and every female on the other with no access to each other even say that we didn't know the other side existed whether each person was gay or straight how long would you say Human life would last for 80/90 years ???

Or how about if everyone stayed where they are now and less than 10% of the population were homosexual... Imagaine that. How on earth would human life continue ?
The point is bones

That man & woman are the core of human life reproduction !!!! We are here today because of this reason.
If it all started with man & man or woman & woman would you be here today.

No matter how hard you try to compromise a fact to suit individuals

The proof is in the pudding
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
7 6 1 54 14
6 5 1 59 12
8 5 2 39 11
6 4 2 53 10
6 4 2 30 10
8 4 4 73 8
7 4 3 40 8
7 4 3 24 8
7 3 4 17 8
7 4 3 -8 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
6 2 4 -31 6
8 3 5 -55 6
7 2 5 -29 4
7 1 6 -87 4
7 1 6 -136 4
Back
Top Bottom